Sean Hannity On Donald Trump's VP: 'I Wouldn't Be Happy With Anyone But Newt Gingrich

Politico.com ^ | 07/12/16 06:52 | Nick Gass

[Arrian]

Hannity hasn’t uttered a sentence w/o interrupting himself multiple times, in decades; always the mark of a complete scatterbrain. And were supposed to care what this inflated nobody thinks???

[A CA Guy]

I think Newt after the first four could step down to Chief of Staff and let a younger person in for #2.
But if the two make positive changes a non Dem could win in 24.

[fieldmarshaldj]

"I think Newt would be a top-notch Ambassador to Mongolia"

I think he does better staying Miss Nancy's Cabana Boy.

[A CA Guy]

I hear #2 did not quite happen that way. It has already been driven by Dems.

[STARLIT]

Don't TRUST This Guy!

[fieldmarshaldj]

Newt would be nearly 82 in 2025. You’d need a forklift to get him off of Nancy Pelosi’s sofa.

[A CA Guy]

Bush just sat down next to Obama, so what? LOL

[STARLIT]

4 seconds quicker but you were thinking of the picture too!LOL

[fieldmarshaldj]

I’m dying to hear Newtie lecture more to us honkeys on how we don’t understand what it’s like to be Black in America. Because pandering to the terrorist BLM group is precisely what the Republicans need to be doing. Yeah. Newtie is smart.

[minnesota_bound]

Newt would be a disaster. He would be a endless target.
He can be in another position but not vp.

[fieldmarshaldj]

Oh, I can’t ever forget the sofa. I mentioned him as her cabana boy upthread before you reposted the pic. :-P

[GreyFriar]

I think Newt would be better as chief of staff. Mike Pence for VP...based upon the rumored names

[odawg]

Hannity evidently thinks it will be Newt.

[rockinqsranch]

I believe Newt will be in the cabinet, and a position he’s meant for, however he should never be the VP choice. He’d be a detriment to the campaign. A millstone if you will for the campaign.

Somebody with no history to rehash, or cause burden to the campaign yet with enough management experience, and preferably political management ability to instill confidence during the campaign.

We have to kick the Democrats collective butts with a single shoe. There isn’t the backing of the party, therefore we need someone who can contribute to a major win. A win so YUUUUUUUUUUUUGE fraud will have no consequence.

No to VP Newt as I think he has his own agenda, and I’d rather my President didn’t have to fight his VP as well as the legislature.

[proust]

He also thought Guliani would be the nominee in 2008

[so_real]

Mitt's back-to-back presidential failures didn't convince you America is not likely to vote "lesser of two evils" this year? There is a contingent of the population who would rather see CWII begin than the country erode further. And that contingent votes. I think Mitt might just snatch defeat from the jaws of Trump's victory. But, I don't think Gingrich has that same effect. If Gingrich has truly seen the light and is wanting to leave a conservative legacy, he'd be a huge asset.

[STARLIT]

[heterosupremacist]

Post #34 ~ I believe Newt will be in the cabinet, and a position he’s meant for, however he should never be the VP choice. He’d be a detriment to the campaign. A millstone if you will for the campaign. ~

Agreed! Newt has too much baggage (although some successes) and I believe Trump is MUCH smarter than Hannity.

[A CA Guy]

He’s running on his professional life skills, not for Miss Alabama.

[itsahoot]

Trump & the Grinch , doesn’t ring.....

Trump & Newt maybe.