[LS]

I’m not. She stupidly ripped the veil off the “non-partisan” supreme court image and exposed them for what we all knew they were: partisan hacks.

[KC_Conspirator]

You are correct. Only reason for the editorials.

[Dilbert San Diego]

In retrospect I wonder how there was no real controversy over her appointment to the court. A major part of her legal career was as general counsel for the ACLU. Yet she was confirmed almost unanimously to the court.

[MIchaelTArchangel]

She violated Canon 5(A)(2) of the federal code of conduct for judges prohibiting judges from making partisan political statement for or against a candidate. Her statements constitute bad behavior. The Constitution allows a judge to remain in the bench for life during “good Behavior” (Article III, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution).

I am writing my U.S. Representative demanding he file articles of impeachment against Justice Ginsburg by the end of the week.

[grania]

Does this put into question every decision this Supreme Court has made with its current makeup? For every issue that Constitutional Conservatives lost by one vote, one of those votes was someone who has exposed her political agenda.

Add that to our strong suspicions that John Roberts is being blackmailed, and you've got our nation being destroyed by a traitorous Supreme Court.

[MIchaelTArchangel]

She violated Canon 5(A)(2) of the federal code of conduct for judges prohibiting judges from making partisan political statement for or against a candidate. Her statements constitute bad behavior. The Constitution allows a judge to remain in the bench for life during “good Behavior” (Article III, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution).

I am writing my U.S. Representative demanding he file articles of impeachment against Justice Ginsburg by the end of the week.