Maybe this guy can help?
Posted on 07/13/2016 9:41:34 PM PDT by detective
The FBI has confirmed to a senior Republican senator that agents were sworn to secrecy -- and subject to lie detector tests -- in the Hillary Clinton email probe, an extensive measure one former agent said could have a "chilling effect."
A July 1 letter sent by a senior deputy to FBI Director James Comey to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, detailed the restrictions on agents. The letter, reviewed by Fox News, confirmed agents signed a "Case Briefing Acknowledgement" which says the disclosure of information is "strictly prohibited" without prior approval, and those who sign are subject to lie detector tests.
"The purpose of this form is to maintain an official record of persons knowledgeable of a highly sensitive Federal Bureau of Investigation counterintelligence investigation," the agreement attached to the Grassley letter reads, "....I (FBI agent) also understand that, due to the nature and sensitivity of this investigation, compliance with these restrictions may be subject to verification by polygraph examination."
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
The same FBI is threatening to prosecute agents who disclose any of the details of the Clinton investigation. This is in violation of the Federal whistle blower statutes.
The FBI refused to question Clinton under oath or to keep a record of her interview. The FBI told agents working on the Clinton case that they are subject to lie detector tests if accused of revealing information.
Orders coming from someone who supports Hillary and thinks like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfRtbIQ1kTw
So let me get this straight: highly sensitive counterintelligence was involved BUT no espionage?
Now that’s “counter intelligent” for you!
In other words, they are going to let her off again.
Comey’s stained himself and the reputation of the Bureau.
Wow. I wish I could get a super-duper doubled top secret order for the results of my activities , even those results I didn’t ‘intend’ to have happen!
Any so-called “progressive” will demand to know what was edited out. They will say things like he wasn’t supporting the idea he mentioned but went on to deride it. Do you know a link more than just that?
Check it out, she can already get the law altered ad hoc to suit her requirements. That woman will be insanely dangerous to humanity if she wins.
There is a link to the entire speech, (in the youtube comments section.) Check it out.
Maybe this guy can help?
Nothing out of the ordinary.
Hillary makes many folks gag.
The FBI’s new mode of operation when dealing with the politically-connected:
1. The accused will not be placed under oath. The interrogation will not be recorded. No records will be kept.
2. FBI agents will take an oath of secrecy. They will sign a non-disclosure agreement. The records will be kept and used against them, if needed.
Different choices would have been made...
It’s time to Get Smart!
Or maybe as Hillary suggests, ‘It Takes A Thief!”
Your #14 sums it all up to a T. And scheming whore hillary skates -yet again!
This explains why none of the agents are resigning in protest that Napolitano predicted. They can resign but not say anything so they wouldn’t accomplish one thing.
Dinesh D’Souza went to prison for supposedly donating too much money politically and Hitlery gets away with treason.
Comey is a stain, the punk was doing what he was told the whore and the rapist will never get a sentence!
Has Napolitano ever been right about anything?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.