[tarpit]

Something is wrong with the narrative. Two shooters, ex military, non-affiliated, both in Nation of Islam (?), neither are members of BLM, both heavily armed and in close proximity to each other (i.e., Dallas).

Lets take a hypothetical here. Suppose that somebody wanted to incite civil unrest in a nation. Further suppose they identify a minority group that has, to date, been relatively violence free. Now, two people violently murder innocent people and it is made to look like they were part of the minority group, when in fact, they were not. If members of the innocent victims group react strongly, would that provoke members of the minority group into civil unrest?

There is a bigger picture here, but I have not yet figured out what I am looking at.

[tarpit]

Here is another example. A police cruiser parked outside an Islamic center, set afire with a note in the foreground that reads BLM. source.

Did the person responsible think that there would be no mention of Islamic Center? Or, was this destination purposefully chosen and for what purpose? I do not Islam and I do not blame BLM. Nothing is what it seems.