Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai

The responses to this proposal in this thread are what I would have read on DU in ‘12

So called conservatives on FR are endorsing major gov’t interference into how banks run their businesses.


39 posted on 07/20/2016 6:05:31 PM PDT by MadIsh32 (In order to be pro-market, sometimes you must be anti-big business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MadIsh32

You mean interference like not letting them gamble with consumers’ money?


41 posted on 07/20/2016 6:32:00 PM PDT by WilliamCooper1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: MadIsh32
So called conservatives on FR are endorsing major gov’t interference into how banks run their businesses.

Banks are already involved in a very incestuous relationship with the government.

I'm fine with eliminating all government regulation of banks, but only if banks agree to eliminate all government protection of their assets.

The problem you have in a deregulated environment is that large banks end up conducting business as a matter of course in environments where they have inherent conflicts of interest.

44 posted on 07/20/2016 7:14:17 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Sometimes I feel like I've been tied to the whipping post.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson