“perhaps a SCOTUS ruling is the only remedy to solve the question, is Ted eligible ?”
I don’t want the black robed tyrants in the Supreme Court to weigh in on this at all, because I fear they’ll interpret the clear intent of the Framers wrongly.
We The People were given the lion’s share of power by the Constitution. Why do we need our employees to ‘explain’ the plain meaning of our founding charter to us, when all they’ve ever done is ratchet our freedoms downward, while arrogating power and authority to themselves?
That leaves the NBC issue at the feet of the electorate, and their understanding of NBC, which has intentionally been so very clouded. I don’t need to remind you that the electorate chose Obummer twice, and never truly vetted him either time. This will not go away with TED. If Rubio gets back in the ring he should know the meaning of NBC in advance. I don’t really want black robed rubes telling us what it means either. But someone, either the Congress or the SCOTUS must rule on the meaning of NBC or it will always be an open question and a source of frustration. Maybe TED can make himself useful and get that question finally answered. Does he have standing to sue himself since he got electoral delegates for which he may not have been eligible ? ;) Just sayin’