Replies

Carter was definitely responsible. The Shah was being advised by Vance and Brzezinski. Initially, Vance held sway telling the Shah not to crack down on the opposition using Savak. The revolutionaries consisted of the students, the so-called bazaaris, the mullahs, the low educated religious elements, and the exiles. As things started to deteriorate fast, Brzezinski got more involved giving just the opposite advice, i.e., the need to crack down on the opposition. By that time it was too late.

The Shah was meeting with our Ambassador, Bill Sullivan, at 3 AM in the mornings trying to make a decision. He felt betrayed by us and rightfully so. Khomeini hijacked the Revolution and started killing off the opposition.

Iran was a very liberal place when I first arrived in July 1977. You could buy Playboy at the newsstand. Women were in Western dress; alcohol was served in restaurants and bars; Iran had more students in US universities than any other country, over 50,000 and there were more women in the Iranian Parliament than in the US Congress. Israel had a trade mission in Tehran. That all changed overnight when Khomeini returned from exile in France.

In terms of numbers, Tehran was our largest Embassy in the world with more than a 1,000 US employees including the military mission. We lost significant intelligence assets monitoring the Soviet nuclear program across the Caspian. It was a huge loss to the intelligence communityy,

The Shah was corrupt, but we and the Iranian people would be far better off today if the Iranian Revolution had not succeeded.

Great analysis from someone who knows.

Ironically, we had a small chance a few years ago when the forces of light surfaced in Iran if for only a moment Obama quickly turned his back.Just shows what a bad potus can do when the wrong person is elected over and over.

Even today Democrats and the left supports removal of the Shah and installation of Khomeini. It’s disgraceful yet they don’t see their error or making such a bad decision.