Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Fourth Circuit overturns NC voter ID law
Charlotte Observer ^ | 7/29/2016 | ANNE BLYTHE

Posted on 07/29/2016 10:04:35 AM PDT by ObozoMustGo2012

RALEIGH The US Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday overturned the 2013 elections law case that included the voter ID provision.

The three-judge panel found that the law was adopted with “discriminatory intent.”

The ruling prohibits North Carolina from requiring photo identification from voters in future elections, including the November 2016 general election, restores a week of early voting and preregistration for 16- and 17-year-olds, and ensures that same-day registration and out-of-precinct voting will remain in effect.

Challengers of the elections law overhaul shepherded through the Republican-led General Assembly in 2013 and signed into law by Gov. Pat McCrory quickly lauded the ruling.

“With surgical precision, North Carolina tried to eliminate voting practices disproportionately used by African-Americans. This ruling is a stinging rebuke of the state’s attempt to undermine African-American voter participation, which had surged over the last decade,” said Dale Ho, director of the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project. “It is a major victory for North Carolina voters and for voting rights.”

This is a developing story. Check for updates.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: ncvoterid; northcarolina; voterfraud; voterid; voteridoverturned
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: ObozoMustGo2012

It was clear this law intended to discriminate against people who had no right to vote to begin with.

Oh wait ...


21 posted on 07/29/2016 10:20:49 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012
"We have to do what we can while we can."
22 posted on July 29, 2016 at 5:59:30 AM CDT by Travis McGee

<><><>

One thing we can all do now, and every morning -is call in to C-span and if it's busy, keep trying. When you get through and your name and/or city is called out - mention freerepublic.com and say some good words about Trump and why he's the best choice. From 1999-2001 I was constantly calling C-span and after redialing a couple times, I was easily able to get through dozens of times in those two years.

And unlike back in those early days, there are now no long distance charges. You can call while having coffee, while sitting in your backyard, while watching tv, while walking down the sidewalk, etc.

If enough fr members call Cspan in the mornings, many of us should easily be able to get through.
And like Travis has stated "...we have to do what we can --------while we can!" :)

22 posted on 07/29/2016 10:21:11 AM PDT by Mr Apple ( CALL CSPAN IN THE MORNINGS / CALL CSPAN IN THE MORNINGS / CALL CSPAN IN THE MORNINGS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012

They will do as many states as they need to steal the election.


23 posted on 07/29/2016 10:21:26 AM PDT by ColdOne (poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~First woman nominated to be Prez, Valerie Jarrett, not Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

You hit the nail on the head


24 posted on 07/29/2016 10:22:11 AM PDT by falcon99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet

Federal judges have lifetime appointments, but I share your feelings. Trump is going to have a hard time in getting the bureaucracy to shift direction .


25 posted on 07/29/2016 10:22:22 AM PDT by buckalfa (I am feeling much better now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

You need an ID to apply for food stamps.


26 posted on 07/29/2016 10:25:18 AM PDT by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012

Who were the 3 judge panel?


27 posted on 07/29/2016 10:25:53 AM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012

They make no pretenses anymore.


28 posted on 07/29/2016 10:28:03 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012

Tyranny.


29 posted on 07/29/2016 10:29:13 AM PDT by TTFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Digger

Larry, Curly and Moe.

CC


30 posted on 07/29/2016 10:30:00 AM PDT by Celtic Conservative (CC: purveyor of cryptic, snarky posts since December, 2000..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Don’t count that out!..Brexit wasn’t suppose to happen either....
.....the weather was REALLY bad in London


31 posted on 07/29/2016 10:31:02 AM PDT by Guenevere (If the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012

An appeals court protecting the RAT party’s right to cheat? Who’d a thunk it? < /sarc >


32 posted on 07/29/2016 10:34:28 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012

this is bs!

C’mon, McCrory,,,,Appeal it!

What the heck to 16 and 17yr olds have any business doing in the voting process anyway.


33 posted on 07/29/2016 10:35:06 AM PDT by Adder (No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012

Gov. McCrory should appeal to the en banc of the 4th circuit.

And he should announce that the law will be followed for November, regardless of any restraining orders approved by a single Federal judge.

The judges can rule, and let them figure out how to enforce their ruling.


34 posted on 07/29/2016 10:35:25 AM PDT by exit82 (Road Runner sez:" Let's Make America Beeping Great Again! Beep! Beep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012

States have no rights these days, don’t kid yourself.


35 posted on 07/29/2016 10:37:14 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Based on that reasoning can we abolish the TSA now? Surely all of their ID demands must also be based on “discriminatory intent.”

Abortion as well... clearly, from the git-go, the Sanger-abortion paradigm is built on "discriminatory intent".

36 posted on 07/29/2016 10:39:01 AM PDT by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012

If photo id has been sanctioned by the USSC why can’t NC pass a new law mNdating photo ID?


37 posted on 07/29/2016 10:39:07 AM PDT by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012

Do it anyway. How are they going to enforce it?


38 posted on 07/29/2016 10:40:00 AM PDT by Mr. K (Trump will win NY state - choke on that HilLIARy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012

This is a Globalist move trying to steal the election for Hillary.


39 posted on 07/29/2016 10:40:06 AM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012; All

Rush is on this now.


40 posted on 07/29/2016 10:42:28 AM PDT by PraiseTheLord (have you seen the fema camps, shackle box cars, thousands of guillotines, stacks of coffins ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson