Posted on 07/29/2016 4:38:05 PM PDT by jazusamo
Edited on 07/29/2016 5:05:48 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
California state and local law enforcement agencies may have to choose between more than $100 million in federal aid and the
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Sanctuary cities are against the law. They should start prosecuting these local authorities instead of just cutting off funds.
Absolutely!
The illegals won’t be here at all so sanctuary will be irrelevant.
I sure hope so.
With all the illegals gone, what are all those working mothers going to do for day care?
Stay home? You're kidding of course.
What are they going to do for gardeners?
Do the yard themselves. You're kidding of course.
Yeah, I don’t see any city being left a “Sanctuary City,” once Trump takes over.
Heck, I’d remove ALL government benefits from citizens in those hell holes. Watch what happens, then.
These sanctuary cities do not enforce the law. But then again neither does the FBI.
they could face prosecution based on their false claim to the government”
They can be Prosecuted for PAST CRIMES even if they comply today, and they should be, Sheriff’s, Mayors, City Councils,...
More than one state did what California tried with Prop 187 which was overturned by a leftist judge deemed “unconstitutional” after being overwhelmingly passed by the ca electorate.
These states started enforcing laws that said no non-citizens could get welfare, foodstamps, schooling, discounted housing and various other laws along those lines.
Those states saw a rise in the state money and a lowering of the unemployment rate.
Self deportation.
Many went to mexico, many went to other states that break those laws. Which are most of them.
Trump, it seems, will cause self-deportation which will put the leftists in a snit because they think Trump is gonna round all of them up and send them back to where they are citizens.
Not necessary if the laws are enforced.
Imagine what Calif’s economy would be like if 187 was implemented back in the last century?
June 10, 2016
For some, “the Kansas experiment” is a negative phrase – an epithet hurled toward anyone who would defend the sweeping tax reforms implemented four years ago in the Sunflower State. For others, however, “the Kansas experiment” is a bold and forward-thinking move. While dividends might not be immediately evident, free-market economists (as well as anyone who believes that when you tax something, you get less of it) are correctly eager to watch the experiment unfold and see where it takes Kansas in the coming years.
Of course, the political left is going to go full Chicken Little, claiming the sky is falling. Reality paints a far less gloomy picture. Since the implementation of tax reform (when the income tax levied on small businesses fell to zero), private-sector employment in Kansas is higher than in other states with a personal income tax. According to analysis from the Kansas Policy Institute, in the 14 years preceding Governor Sam Brownback’s tax reform, private sector jobs grew by just 2.3% total (or .02% per year), for that entire time span. That’s just 62.5% of the average growth for states with an income tax, and a paltry 15.4% of the average growth of states that do not levy an income tax. The picture gets brighter after the Brownback tax reform. Over the last three years alone, private sector employment increased by 4.0%.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.