I've always found this to be an effective product.
Posted on 08/04/2016 2:18:13 PM PDT by drewh
Paul Nehlen, the primary challenger of Republican Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, strongly suggested during an interview with Morning Answer Chicago Thursday that the United States should simply kick all Muslims out of the country.
Nehlen said the problem with vetting good Muslims from the bad is that they couldn’t be trusted. “Islam is the only major religion that encourages lying,” he argued. “The taqiyya says you have to lie to the infidel, you lie to them if you have to… I mean if they lie, how do you vet something like that?”
“So then how do you implement the test that you want to implement?” asked host Dan Proft.
“The question is, why do we have Muslims in the country?” Nehlen responded. “How can you possibly vet somebody who lies?”
“So are you suggesting that we deport all of the Muslims in the country?” Proft asked.
“I’m suggesting we have a discussion about it, that’s for sure,” he responded.
An indignant Proft asked Nehlen if he really supported deporting American citizens who hadn’t actually done anything wrong. “Well if somebody supports sharia, that is doing something wrong,” Nehlan said.
Listen above, via WIND.
If he had suggested kicking Ryan out I’d be on board.
You don't get it: Democrats and Republicans, as parties, are both of the globalist-elite now. It's not republican vs Democrat, but Globalist vs nationalist: this explains why the republican party was (and still is) against Trump: he's a nationalist, being about America and the interest of its people is absolutly incompatible with the Globalist mindset — it's also, IMO, the reason they were pushing Ted so hard: the undermining of the NBC requirement is obviously nationalistic in nature and it's quite telling to me how many of our recent presidential nominees had issues. (EG McCain vs Obama, both aren't qualified as natural-born citizens of have very weak arguments, Ted Cruz was just so completely and obviously unqualified that I can easily imagine them allowing him to win simply to sacrifice the requirement on the alter of 'precedence' — it's something that the government, almost regardless of branch, resorts to in order to undermine the constraints of the Constitution. [Just look at Kentucky v. King.])
I totally support Nehlen’s stance on muslims. He is 100% correct.
How the heck do you propose to revoke the citizenship of people who were born here?
Nehlen rocks.
Let’s just get the second and final crusade started and be done with them forever.
By doing it.
I’m not interested in having muslims in my country, and I do not care how they are gotten rid of.
And in case I didn’t make myself clear, I do not care at all how they are gotten rid of.
“You cannot deport people whoare already citezens nor should you”
Dead wrong.
I see.
How many do you, personally, plan to kill?
“Well if somebody supports sharia, that is doing something wrong,” Nehlan said.
*******************************
Sharia cannot coexist with the Constitution.
Sharia and its adherents mean to displace the Constitution.
There can be no peace until there is only Islam, according to their book.
Mad Mo made it so.
I've always found this to be an effective product.
That’s a non-answer. And more or less what I expect.
Oh it’s an answer all right.
You can either understand its meaning or not. I don’t really care.
Here’s a hint for you. They intend to do the same to you and everyone like you.
If your citizenship is given by Congress...aka naturalized by man made law, then it can be taken away.
Being born here does not make you a citizen. Children born to foreign nationals[legal or illegal] are not U.S. citizens.
Good question
The Democrats are registering Muslims like crazy. a part of Obama’s plan to “fundamentally change America.”
In 2011 there were an estimated 2.75 million Muslims in the U.S. with a large majority — 63% — of them being immigrants. The number has grown to 3.3 million Muslims living in the United States in 2015.
There are currently 824,000 registered Muslim voters whose first, middle or last names match a list of more than 43,500 traditionally Muslim names. That’s compared to about 500,000 registered voters with Muslim names in 2012.
Yes, that can be revoked (for cause), and the malefactor deported to country of origin. Advocating violent revolution may well be cause. Back when we had immigration standards, we didn't take communists, anarchists, criminals, or other categories of undesirables. Moslem should be added to that list.
Being born here does not make you a citizen.
Spare me the pettifoggery. Being born here of citizen parents DOES make you a citizen, and that citizenship is NOT given by act of Congress, and it cannot be revoked by act of Congress (or anything else). Be careful what can of worms you open.
So ... how many do you, personally, plan to kill?
Mr. Clean will clean your whole house and everything that’s in it. Means them all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.