Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/04/2016 4:00:35 PM PDT by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Elderberry

This is whyI hate these retarded laws that don’t tackle an issue head on, but play games around the issue. Wtf does corpse burial of a murdered child have to do with being pro life? How about laws to prosecute the doctors and the “mothers” for the murders?


2 posted on 08/04/2016 4:04:56 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

Doesn’t matter what the laws says. If it’s pro-life in tone, a federal judge will overturn it. Of course, if they wanted to turn the dead babies into earrings or something, that would be super-OK.


3 posted on 08/04/2016 4:06:09 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

It’s a very tricky issue, to say the least. I can see the points for either side. I think the manner of disposal should be the mother’s option , and this choice should be made before the procedure if any, is performed. It would be too much to bring this up for discussion afterward. The mother may be in a subdued state of shock for a while leading up to and immediately afterward.

That’s not the time for her to make such a broad decision. Meanwhile, I hope Adult Stem Cell Research becomes much more common. Fetal tissue is not the only way. We know that now.


4 posted on 08/04/2016 4:07:39 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

When I miscarried my first child at 12 weeks, I asked for the remains to bury her. I was given a specimin bottle marked ‘biohazard’. When I spoke to a funeral home, I was told I only needed a death certificate after 20 weeks gestation and they could not bury without a death certificate. We ended up burying her at our ranch.

The irony is, in CA I could have aborted her past 20 weeks (not that I would) and not needed a death certificate.


6 posted on 08/04/2016 4:23:14 PM PDT by reaganaut (I'm looking forward to Trump as President. I'm an Evangelical and I vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry
“That I would have had to take or make either of those decisions is mind-boggling and terrifying,” Booker said of the proposed requirements. “I can’t imagine how much worse that would’ve made my situation.”

Exactly what is the issue here? Is Booker saying that disposing of her unborn fetus in the landfill is a better option than cremation or burial? What am I missing? She would likely have chosen cremation and the hospital would have incinerated the remains. End of story. I am not sure why anyone would object for any reason.

7 posted on 08/04/2016 4:49:45 PM PDT by TheDon (BO must be replaced immediately for the good of the nation and the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry
Having lost several children to miscarriages I don't understand her point.

A child is a child and losing one before or after birth is devastating.

But I think the thought that my precious children had been tossed in a landfill like so much garbage would have made it much worse not better.

Is she trying to pretend she did not lose a "real" child to avoid the grief that it brings?

8 posted on 08/04/2016 7:19:26 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson