How does anyone explain how a woman who has spawned scandal, corruption, lies, deceit, law breaking, and moral and ethical bankruptcy while in the political limelight for almost three decades is ahead in the race for President in 2016?
What does it say about a political party who would nominate someone with her record to run on their ticket?
It defies logic and explanation, but yet it’s reality.
Obviously, there’s a whole other world out there that thinks very, very differently than you and I do.
It doesn’t really surprise me. After all we are talking about the Slave Party and the fellow travelling communist Democrat Party.
What I didn’t expect was so called conservatives and patriots to go AWOL in the battle against Filthy Rotten Clinton. Now THAT has been a surprise.
The problem is that the folks that liked the Bushes are comfortable with the Clintons.
The surprise to me is that, despite unprecedented access to all kinds of information via the WWW, a great many people have no clue what differentiates a conservative and a liberal. They just believe conservative = bad, liberal = good.
Maybe it's because the "so-called" conservatives we've thrown our weight behind have not governed as conservatives and have blurred the lines. Maybe it's because of the constant onslaught against conservative principles that has gone on for decades in the media and in schools. Maybe liberals have perfected the act of acting like conservatives while running, yet governing true to form as liberals. It's a combination of many factors.
If you watch Jesse Watters on FNC and his interviews with every day people, you understand what we're dealing with and it ain't pretty.