Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/05/2016 6:22:01 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick
Trump needs to speak about this! Another example of some refugee animals Obama is letting in. I just read it and it made me sick:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/04/exclusive-5-year-old-victims-father-saw-video-of-twin-falls-refugee-rape/

2 posted on 08/05/2016 6:24:55 AM PDT by demkicker (My passion for freedom is stronger than that of Democrats whose obsession is to enslave me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

Bookmark


3 posted on 08/05/2016 6:27:29 AM PDT by Southside_Chicago_Republican (If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick
This, quoted from CNN: "...So it might come as a surprise to hear a group of Gold Star families describe a private meeting with Trump as "warm" and "compassionate." But Karen Vaughn, whose son Aaron, a Navy SEAL, died in Afghanistan, said she left it feeling that Trump understood where the families were coming from...."

Does the wording of this strike anyone as odd? It has been my experience that anytime someone uses the word "but" in writing (especially in contested issues) they say something conciliatory before the word "but" is used, and their true feelings (usually the opposite of what came before the word "but") are written after the word.

This is odd, because you would expect them to say something like "...So it might come as a surprise to hear a group of Gold Star families describe a private meeting with Trump as "warm" and "compassionate." But many other Gold Star families are incensed at Donald Trump for attacking another Gold Star family...." (The bold underlined text is mine for example, not something from their article...)

Does this seem odd to anyone else? Almost as if they are hoping people will see the word "but" and automatically assume something unflattering to Donald Trump will follow, or is is just poor editing by CNN?

I must admit that I think it is poor editing, but I can't rule out that they are trying to be clever in their way. (LOL, if you use my rule of thumb, it appears I REALLY think they are trying to be clever!)

4 posted on 08/05/2016 6:37:51 AM PDT by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

As a parent, I truly sympathize with Mr. and Mrs Khan on the loss of their beloved son.
What I puzzle about is why Mr. Khan stands forth the the Presidential candidate who will surely do the most harm to this country.
I ask, then, a question. Is the Democrat Party using Mr. Khan for their own purposes, while ignoring and villifiying other grieving parents? OR, is Mr. Khan using the circumstance to himself use the Democrat Party for his own personal reasons?
The circumstances remind me of Cindy Sheehan.(sp?)
Paraded over the media when needed, then cast aside like an old shoe.


6 posted on 08/05/2016 6:46:57 AM PDT by CaptainAmiigaf (New York Times: "We print the news as it fits our views.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

Obviously that’s just one more lying Gold Star Mother. /s


9 posted on 08/05/2016 7:09:08 AM PDT by Let's Roll ("You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality" -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson