Replies

Here is some stuff form a link to a link(I've been sitting on the email story since I didn't have permission) but since its up....

http://www.thecanary.co/2016/07/29/paris-strikes-astonishing-partnership-secret-isis-sponsor-ties-hillary-clinton/

.........provided key services for the covert arms export network that supplied Saddam Hussein. To prevent exposure of that secret supply line, and collateral damage to Hillary Clinton – who joined Lafarge board in 1990, just as the arms pipeline was being shut down… the Justice Department was told to bury the investigation… But investigators from other US government agencies who worked on the case say they were ‘waved off’ whenever they got too close to exposing the direct involvement of the intelligence community in the arms export scheme. Lafarge remains close to the Clintons to this day. In 2013, Lafarge’s Executive Vice President for Operations, Eric Olson, was a ‘featured attendee’ at the Clinton Global Initiative’s annual meeting.

The company is a regular donor to the Clinton Foundation – the firm’s up to $100,000 donation was listed in its annual donor list for 2015. Lafarge is also listed again as a donor to the Clinton Foundation for the first quarter of 2016.

Lafarge is a major beneficiary of disaster capitalism in Iraq, dominating a market where Iraq’s infrastructure remains in dire need of hundreds of billions of dollars in investment. The company describes itself as “one of the largest non-oil investors in Iraq.”

The firm is not just an economic juggernaut. Its murky history of intelligence ties, and significant political clout in France and the US – the countries leading the airstrikes against Isis in Syria – raise the question of whether Lafarge believes it can profit from terror without accountability.

Bottom line there is so much in the deleted 30,000 emails that Assange has it should remove her form any consideration of any voter but you know how that goes.

Cotton pointed out that the name of the Iranain scientist just executed was in those e-mails, and shows that Clinton exposed sensitive information. Conclusion, she lacks the judgment necessary to protect US interests.

Thinking back, the defense she raises and implies is that if a message doesn't have a big "TOP SECRET" heading marked on it, then it's reasonable to conclude the contents are not sensitive. This is the defense she raised in her no-white-reporters-allowed press convention performance. She has no judgment, she needs a big prominent header to guide her.

Thanks for the link. Assange mentioned the Lefarge connection in his interview with RT where he said he would release more emails about the Clinton Foundation. He also said that the biggest contributor to the Clinton Foundation was the Saudis, which brings up the Huma Abedin role. I don't adhere to conspiracy theories, but there are too many connections and coincidences that bear investigation. The book, Clinton Cash, provides the connections, now they must be investigated. Unfortunately, a tainted FBI and DOJ will not do it.

I think it interesting to hear Morell claim that Trump was turned by Putin. This could be a preemptive strike to discredit future Wikileaks disclosures.

Bottom line there is so much in the deleted 30,000 emails that Assange has it should remove her form any consideration of any voter but you know how that goes.

Agreed. But Assange makes the point that his data are "pristine", i.e., no one is disputing the accuracy and legitimacy of what he has revealed. The DNC information was accepted by everyone as being accurate, including the DNC, which saw the resignation of the chair and many of the top staff. A second installment of Wikileaks about the Clinton Foundation could prove devastating because the source data will be difficult to refute. Hence, the need for the Dems and Morell to make the Russian connection and a foreign power interfering in our elections.

Even the biased MSM will have a hard time covering it up. I would like Assange to release it a few days before the first debate.