To: ConservativeMind
Pretty simple answer: either test properly, or get rid of the regulation. The university that found the “cheating” tested properly under real world conditions. The official government testers did not. For that they need to be fired.
11 posted on
08/08/2016 7:06:50 PM PDT by
palmer
(Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet over to foreign enemies)
To: palmer
Pretty simple answer: either test properly, or get rid of the regulation. The university that found the cheating tested properly under real world conditions. The official government testers did not. For that they need to be fired.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The systems passed the specified tests, and thereby met the specs.
24 posted on
08/08/2016 7:52:52 PM PDT by
loungitude
(The truth hurts.)
To: palmer
Pretty simple answer: either test properly, or get rid of the regulation. The university that found the cheating tested properly under real world conditions. The official government testers did not. For that they need to be fired.
The generic problem that you run into is determining whether a real world test has so much variability in it that one car may fail when it should otherwise pass or pass when it should otherwise fail. The only way out of this issue is to have a test like the current ones and then randomly monitor vehicles and if a particular model falls too far outside of specs, investigate.
26 posted on
08/08/2016 8:11:29 PM PDT by
ronnietherocket3
(Mary is understood by the heart, not study of scripture.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson