Wow.
1 posted on
08/09/2016 10:55:03 AM PDT by
proust
To: proust
Doubt it.
May have tried to reach the guy, but too risky to be seen colluding.
2 posted on
08/09/2016 10:57:23 AM PDT by
CincyRichieRich
(Have Faith...If you have none, pray and ask Him for more.)
To: proust
If true, that’s awesome.
I look forward to the next big bombshell.
To: proust
I think Roger Stone is playing some casual head games with Hillary Rotten Criminal.
(of course those games won't last long because Queen 'RAT's head is already totally f--ked, lol)
5 posted on
08/09/2016 10:59:06 AM PDT by
mkjessup
(The 'RATS are the ENEMY!! From OBAMA-'RAT to HILLARY ROTTEN RAT! GET RID OF THE 'RATS!!)
To: proust
I thought it was the Russians.
To: proust
Leftist meltdown on the comment page. LOL!
11 posted on
08/09/2016 11:04:48 AM PDT by
ScaniaBoy
(Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
To: proust
So what? The scandal isn't the Wikileaks has the emails or is using them to torpedo Hillary. The scandal is what is in those emails. They show the bad character, the corruption and the outright treachery of Hillary Clinton.
Her campaign deserves to be torpedoed!
13 posted on
08/09/2016 11:07:55 AM PDT by
Angels27
To: proust
It would be great if these emails were separated as to topic area,date and given some expert level of explanation. There often seems to be too much for anyone to digest. I suspect available information maybe falling through the cracks.
16 posted on
08/09/2016 11:09:32 AM PDT by
stocksthatgoup
(Don't argue with a Liberal. Ask him simple questions and listen to him stutter)
To: proust
That would be good news if true!
17 posted on
08/09/2016 11:12:34 AM PDT by
New Jersey Realist
(America: The land of the free because of the brave)
To: proust
How is it that the press people can be in touch with Assange, but when an “ally” of Trump is, it’s “colluding?”
19 posted on
08/09/2016 11:19:15 AM PDT by
EDINVA
20 posted on
08/09/2016 11:27:57 AM PDT by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
To: proust
Disinformation to keep the press interested.
23 posted on
08/09/2016 11:38:57 AM PDT by
Chaguito
To: proust
Misleading title—that’s not at all what Stone has asserted.
To: proust
Colluding no, inquisitive yes.
26 posted on
08/09/2016 11:47:48 AM PDT by
mancini
To: proust
Stone is an establishment jerk, although if true, he’s heading for his own personal “Fort Marcy Park.”
< Hillarycide>
To: proust
Wikileaks denies:
WikiLeaks
@wikileaks
46 min
@rogerjstonejr Neither @WikiLeaks nor Mr. Assange is aware of any private communications from us to you. Please clarify.
38 posted on
08/09/2016 1:06:07 PM PDT by
ScaniaBoy
(Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson