Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I think most of us saw this coming.
1 posted on 08/09/2016 11:17:49 PM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
To: amorphous

We are now approaching the level of tyranny Jefferson warned us about.


2 posted on 08/09/2016 11:22:22 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

If these homo’s want to have this fight now, I say let’s bring it.


3 posted on 08/09/2016 11:26:27 PM PDT by Bullish (That establishment heads from both sides are exploding over Trump is the very best part.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

Donald Trump wants to repeal a Lyndon Johnson era law that prevents the discussion of political topics in houses of worship.


5 posted on 08/09/2016 11:29:46 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

[[The case erupted when the state’s Civil Rights Commission first claimed the authority to control the content of sermons and then to define what’s religious. ]]

The black robe regiment needs to rise again


6 posted on 08/09/2016 11:32:56 PM PDT by Lera ( 1 Corinthians 15:1-4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

This is very serious. The US freedom of speech is unique, no other country, in Europe or elsewhere has anything similar to this. Instead, they do ban certain opinions to be said. The Iowa law should be overturned.


10 posted on 08/09/2016 11:47:17 PM PDT by Freelance Warrior (A Russian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

>I think most of us saw this coming.

We did. This is the last election where out vote maters. Future elections will involve counting the dead and the number still armed and fighting.


11 posted on 08/09/2016 11:48:17 PM PDT by RedWulf (End Free trade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

yeah, that lesbian mayor in CA? or somewhere wanted to grab the priests’ notes last year, or something like that. It was shot down but next time it won’t be. Subpena. That’s what she wanted to do.

Anyway, if we’re really Prepared to Dance with the regime IF Trump loses, let me know how serious you all are.

I’ll start getting in shape.

Yeah i know, i should do it for myself, but i wont.

There may come a time when our words are put to the test.


12 posted on 08/09/2016 11:53:27 PM PDT by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

Absolutely-—the sodomites want the children so pederasty is next for their NWO agenda where Vice is Virtue and Males are Female (radical egalitarianism (Marxism)-—a return to their Luciferean Babylonian religion of Ba’al Rites.

Forcing pagan and satanic religion on the Christian Church is unconstitutional. The State is endorsing and forcing Satanism by promoting the vice of Sodomy in our “Just” Laws-—lol-—there never can be “vice” promoted in a Just Law-—it is an oxymoronic statement-—just like “homosexual marriage”—no such union possible....males sodomizing males is irrational, degrading, meaningless and evil—just domination (never “love”).


14 posted on 08/10/2016 12:07:11 AM PDT by savagesusie (When Law ceases to be Just, it ceases to be Law. (Thomas A./Founders/John Marshall)/Nuremberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

Vote Trump


20 posted on 08/10/2016 12:46:24 AM PDT by Nifster (Ignore all polls. Get Out The Vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

Mosques are exempt, just ask the Orlando Shooter’s daddy who preached against Gays and Homosexuals ....


23 posted on 08/10/2016 12:50:02 AM PDT by GraceG (Only a fool works hard in an environment where hard work is not appreciated...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

The Bible lists homosexuality together with child sacrifice among the “abominations” practiced by the peoples living in the land about to be conquered by the Jews. The two are certainly not morally equatable, but they both characterized a morally primitive world that Judaism set out to destroy. In fact, homosexuality is among the sexual offenses that constitute one of the “seven laws of the children of Noah” that Judaism holds all people must observe). The practice of homosexuality is called an abomination for a reason. Homosexuality denies many of Judaism’s most fundamental principles. It denies life, it denies God’s expressed desire that men and women cohabit, and it denies the root structure that Judaism wishes for all mankind, the family. The Torah equates child sacrifice with male homosexuality: Both represent death. Child sacrifice deprives children of life, homosexuality prevents their having life. This parallelism is present in the Talmud: “He who does not engage in propagation of the race is as though he had shed blood.”

The Bible begins by saying “It is not good for man to be alone.” God could have created another man to keep Adam company. No! Instead, God created a woman; not a few women and not a community of women. Man’s solitude was not a function of his not being with other people; it was a function of his being without a woman. In order to become fully human, male and female must join. The union of male and female is not merely some lovely ideal; it is the essence of the Jewish outlook on becoming human. To deny it is tantamount to denying a primary purpose of life.

The above I have excerpted from the article by Dennis Prager:

“Judaism’s Sexual Revolution: Why Judaism (and then Christianity) Rejected Homosexuality”

http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/articles2/PragerHomosexuality.php

It would be good to read this article for it provides strong arguments about the homosexual abomination that is being celebrated around the world. Prager concludes that what’s at stake is civilization. When men, inspired by their creator declared that sexuality is to be divided between male and female, civilization moved forward as never before. The acceptance of homosexuality as the equal of heterosexual marital love signifies the decline of Western civilization as surely as the rejection of homosexuality and other nonmarital sex made the creation of this civilization possible.


25 posted on 08/10/2016 1:32:43 AM PDT by jonrick46 (The Left has a mental disorder: A totalitarian mindset..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

Since when are churches public accommodations?

Someone needs to slap down these people...with prejudice!


26 posted on 08/10/2016 2:58:49 AM PDT by Adder (No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

Is our government going to come out against Muslims preaching anti-gay, anti-woman, anti-anyone-but-Muslim in their mosques?


29 posted on 08/10/2016 4:26:42 AM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

I was just going to post the same thing.

Next - churches will be forced to marry homosexuals.

We are no longer America - land of the free and home of the brave.

Wonder how the mosques will react?


30 posted on 08/10/2016 4:56:28 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

“The case erupted when the state’s Civil Rights Commission first claimed the authority to control the content of sermons and then to define what’s religious.”

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

That is because the Federal Government is EMBRACING hedonism. The Federal Government wants NOTHING to do with God - except to take His place.


32 posted on 08/10/2016 5:01:53 AM PDT by Repent and Believe (The Son of Man, when He cometh, shall He find, think you, faith on earth? Jesus Christ (Luke 18:8))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

there should be signs on the doors

no queers
no dykes


34 posted on 08/10/2016 5:02:54 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP ....Opabinia can teach us a lot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

I’m just surprised it came out of Iowa first.


35 posted on 08/10/2016 5:04:06 AM PDT by Gamecock (There is always one more idiot than you counted on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous; Old Sarge; aragorn; AZ .44 MAG; Art in Idaho; Candor7; easternsky; EnigmaticAnomaly; ...

PING!!!

Article and comments

Thanks, amorphous


39 posted on 08/10/2016 5:18:17 AM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous
While there's been a great deal of fear mongering on this subject in the past, this looks like a genuine case of discrimination.

Under the law, compelling an individual business to serve homos is likely legal. But compelling a church to refrain from advocating the written gospel is a clear transgression of the 1st Amendment.

40 posted on 08/10/2016 5:22:13 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

The government has already said preachers can’t be political. Now they can’t preach on homosexuality. Next, what will it be? Guns? Family values? Shopping and home décor? Maybe the government should send out pre-approved sermons.


41 posted on 08/10/2016 5:25:03 AM PDT by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson