|
|
   |
Posted on 08/10/2016 3:39:01 PM PDT by artichokegrower
The U.S. Secret Service says it has spoken to the Donald Trump campaign about Second Amendment comments the GOP nominee for president made yesterday that rival Hillary Clinton called a “casual inciting of violence.”
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
Which at the time worked as a big reason NOT to shoot Obama.
I’m greatful for the post. It show SF paper repeating a CNN lie as fact.
It’s BS stories like this that has Donald determined that laws be changed so that the news organizations who made up these deliberate lies can be successfully sued.
There are laws against false publishing no? If so, then I see a law suit here.
Lots of Money for you lawyers if you have the gumption to go get it.
““Look, this guy is coming pretty close to the edge here,” the official said.”
I would say that the former secret service agent should pull out his handy dandy government issue of the Constitution and re-read the 2nd Ammendment. As a popular bumper sticker here in Texas states, “The 2nd Ammendment Ain’t About Duck Hunting”.....
Why post nonsense? You know it isn’t true. Many people just read the title. You are helping to spread propaganda.
How many dead people are being ignored right now by the press?
Lie
“
—————laws be changed so that the news organizations who made up these deliberate lies can be successfully sued.”
You mean that there are NO laws against printing lies now?
.
Tell me, can anyone be successfully sued for this story?
I’m not an attorney, so I can only rely on history for my answer, which tells me the answer is no.
Perhaps you have more and better information?
It’s good to know the unholy trinity of the San Francisco Chronic, and presumably the Sacramento Bwheeee! and San Josie Mercury as well—lefty fishwrap all—are spewing their usual untrue calumny about Donald Trump.
And thanks for your and Pinkbell’s ..... concern in peddling their meretricious BS on this conservative website.
But Glenn Beck aka Stabby the Clown broke no law threatening Trump? This whole issue insults those of us who support the Second Amendment as a bunch af violent savages.
Why post a false story?
= = =
So I can get the facts from Freepers, and not have to click to the SF Chronicle.
“FNC has already reported that this story is bogus.”
Actually I am a little amazed by that.
another lie by another media outlet who claims to be not biased, but we all know they lie.
So why put up BS?
“Perhaps you have more and better information?”
==
Not me-—that’s why I asked the question.
“casual inciting of violence.”
What about casualty directives issued by a haters like ‘ punish your enemies?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.