“Commerce? How ‘bout the 9th/10th instead?”
Well, those work together. If it’s not an enumerated power (commerce, for example) then it’s reserved to the states or the citizens. So if you talk about the Commerce Clause, you are talking about the 9th and 10th also.
>
Well, those work together. If it’s not an enumerated power (commerce, for example) then it’s reserved to the states or the citizens. So if you talk about the Commerce Clause, you are talking about the 9th and 10th also.
>
IMO, we’re debating over the same word...different meaning.
The “...regulate Commerce...among the several States...” is the *farthest* from true in the last 100yrs+; let alone any ‘authority’ to regulate any all drug(s), recreational or otherwise.
My contention still stands: They came a bit too close to home of letting the cat out of the bag.