Posted on 08/17/2016 8:51:12 PM PDT by D-fendr
This is from the Omaha Platform, the 1892 declaration of the People’s Party:
We have witnessed for more than a quarter of a century the struggles of the two great political parties for power and plunder, while grievous wrongs have been inflicted upon the suffering people. We charge that the controlling influences dominating both these parties have permitted the existing dreadful conditions to develop without serious effort to prevent or restrain them. Neither do they now promise us any substantial reform. They have agreed together to ignore in the coming campaign every issue but one. They propose to drown the outcries of a plundered people with the uproar of a sham battle over the tariff, so that capitalists, corporations, national banks, rings, trusts, watered stock, the demonetization of silver, and the oppressions of the usurers may all be lost sight of. They propose to sacrifice our homes, lives and children on the altar of mammon; to destroy the multitude in order to secure corruption funds from the millionaires.
I think this is what will win DJT the election.
If this election against the most corrupt candidate for POTUS from either party in history can’t be won, it’s hard to imagine one that can be won in the future after the illegal aliens are all added to the voter rolls. This is it.
Saw the interview.
From the distance and space of my own car, I yelled the response:
“He’s in WI, speaking about ways to help the black - you are aware of the news of the riot here, yes? So Trump gives a speech in Wisconsin about the problems and solutions for the black community, crime, economy, culture; the history of government policy. And, you, Don Lemon, want to make this racist? He’s a racist for this?
Shame on you.
Only if they can keep hillary’s falsified ballot counts in check.
Trump needs to find a way to get the message out in spite of those SOBs in the MSM.
*******************************************
Bannon may have some ideas on how to do this .... I think that’s why Trump threw away the ‘establishment’ playbook some were trying to force on him & hired Bannon. Mook, from Hilly’s campaign, was having a fit and flinging all sorts of cr@p around in reaction .... it’s terribly problematic for the Dems when they don’t have the Romney/Jeb Bush types that they can predict and intimidate. Bannon won’t play nice.
I will never trust the "media"....unless Trump creates a new one.
Agreed, I had been waiting for him to broach this topic for quite awhile......
” the most corrupt candidate for POTUS from either party” Please explain how Hillary’s corruption “compares” to Trump’s.
>>>I will never trust the “media”....unless Trump creates a new one.
If Trump succeeds old media will piggyback, or new media will succeed who do.
They have readers/constituents whom they serve.
Because “soon” is vague, I’m guessing a couple of weeks. It must happen before the mail-in voting starts.
I just turned 30 and started a small business when Reagan took office. It quit making a profit about 6-7 years ago.
I wonder what kind of ‘dirt’ the MSM and DNC will try to manufacture against Kellyanne. We all know well the kind of filthy politics they’re famous for.
>>>Because soon is vague, Im guessing a couple of weeks. It must happen before the mail-in voting starts.
Not going to second guess you on this timing.
Much of the media never did “warm up” to Reagan. They were always poised to stick a fork in him and they threw everything they had at him. At the end they were calling him demented and crazy.
My memory is after his re-election it was a lovefest for RR.
I think because so much of America loved him and the media had to satisfy that.
The “at the end’ part was much later. Reagan Revisionism necessary to revise his presidency.
You misunderstood me. I said in history, meaning Hilary is the most corrupt candidate ever from either party In history. It has nothing to do with Trump! I was not comparing him to her!
DT won't forget who crapped on him, they will pay a price.
I was thinking Trump should give that speech again too.
Marking this so I can watch the rest of the speech.
Except no one will see it. Did you see the report on it on your evening news? No, of course not. They had some crap about Russian/Ukrainian pay off to the new assistant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.