You're right. I should have said "politician-debater." Standards are far different. She certainly can't form a logical and objectively persuasive case. But she can string together Democrat talking points - which are all focus grouped and poll tested over years - and can appear to run rings around a truth-teller. I think Trump will get dinged. But he thinks well on his feet, and will be able to score some points on her as well.
My only concern is that he not underrate her. She is a CONGENITAL liar - and dissembles without shame.
Trump needs to prepare himself for heavy heavy RIDICULE from her — it is the only tool she will use against him and he needs to take the ridicule and turn it back on her, so it does not hit him!! She has been testing some of her “ridicule “ lines already. “The Trump kids have killed a lot of animals....” she told the animal protestors; she will try to use “You’re fired” against him; she will say he hates women and minorities and is “unfit” and that his “temperament” is not right. She will only be GOADING him the entire debate to flash a temper tantrum. His goal has to be to stay steady and hit her where she is weak, like on national security and women’s rights. He can win this one!
She will try to lie, but he needs to be prepared for the ultimate man-hater, man-humiliater, and self-loather in her to come out against him. And he needs to use what she says to reflect what she is to the entire world.