My point was specific to the Pulitzer Prizes. It does not mean there are no other reasons that some media types are willing to take on Hillary. I’m merely pointing out that they should not expect to be rewarded with a Pulitzer, which is extremely unlikely to be awarded for any work taking down a liberal politician.
Didn’t mean to suggest I was disputing your point.
I was using it as a jumping off point to yet another liberal article published today that was exposed by conservative press back in mid-June -— the Laureate scandal.
I am wondering why some prominent Dems are calling for an end to the Clinton Foundation now and some liberal press are spilling the beans the last several days [see my post 28].
Are they so convinced a Hillary victory is in the bag and nothing can harm her?