I thought scientific polls would have similar results...unless there is another agenda???
Yes there is an agenda.
Wasn’t there a story around the time of the Democrat convention, that Reuters was changing their polling methodology, and that this change resulting in a big boost for Hillary in their polls???
If these polls are accurate, they should not be all over the place.
And they shouldn’t contradict each other.
For example, some recent polls in battleground states show Hillary with leads in every single one of those states.
But that’s impossible, if Hillary and Trump are basically tied nationwide.
Then you hear stories such as how polls show solid red states as Utah are competitive this time around. That also makes no sense in comparison with other polls.
If Trump is in a tight race in Utah, then Hillary would indeed win an landslide nationwide.