Posted on 08/27/2016 10:39:49 AM PDT by CharlesOConnell
I wondered how a comparatively neutral search engine, not like Google, Bing or Yahoo, would trend "Clinton Body Count" vs. "Trump Body Count".
Trump is about as old as Clinton, presumably he's had civil conflicts with people in his business life, I thought there might be SOMETHING about his ordering a hit on some unfavored associate.
But aside from The Daily Beast screaming something about "Donald Trump Makes Worst Mass Shooting in U.S. History All About Him", I can't find any trend about "Trump Body Count" that doesn't immediately jump track over to Clinton.
If this were an election for mayor of Chicago, I’d be worried about the body count, which somehow turn into votes for the Democrat nominee.
I’d like to think that most of the rest of the country has a little more integrity. With certain exceptions, of course!
In other words, arm up.
So to speak
I didn’t follow politics during the 90s, because I was too young. I recently read a few stories about people who died. I think the Clintons are evil, but I can’t buy that they had people killed.
I can, there are just too many instances!
Ping.
5.56mm
I was trying to explain to you why Trump doesn’t have a “body count” of the particular Hillary type.
Bookmark.
Can some one post a link to original Image or post clearer image for use on http://Twitter.com/DMashak
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.