Judicial Watch Submits Email Questions to Hillary Clinton – Written Answers, Under Oath, Due Sept...

Judicial Watch ^ | Aust 30, 2016 | Tom Fitton

[9422WMR]

Her response:
I don’t recall.
Then what can anyone do?

[upchuck]

Perhaps Killary could get a rubber stamp made that says, “I do not recall any of the requested information in this question.”

Having a rubber stamp will save lots of time.

[R_Kangel]

Her Lawyer will answer the questions for her.

[treetopsandroofs]

“It’s political suicide.”

Like Whitewatergate, Travelgate, Fostergate, Benghazigate and billions of dollars missing while SOS?

[faithhopecharity]

Answers to Written interrogatories are notoriously superficial... Extremely well thought out and comprehensively vetted by defense counsel. Realistically, we can’t get our hopes up. The court, so long as it limits hilliary’s “testimony” to interrogatories, is basically is letting Hilliary off

[NEMDF]

Exactly. She will not remember any details of anything. She will say that Comey said she told the truth. She will say that Colin Powell sent emails from a personal account once. It was all so long ago, and she has been so busy since then, trying to save the world by running for POTUS and all the good being done by the Clinton Foundation.

[Cheerio]

Very damming indeed. Anyone on this planet that believes she will honestly answer any of these questions is simply living in Alice's Wonderland.

Hitlery will obfuscate, lie, and have the Nation's Liar-In-Chief, Obumbler, claim all of this information falls under the privileged and confidential informaition between him and her her due to the nature of their positions as rulers of the World.

Hey, the precedent has already been established - Obumbeler protected AG Holder with a client privilege excuse. The opposition party is really in disguise and is nothing more than RAT-Lite, and has proven over and over they will not GO AGAINST THIS MUSLIM IN POWER NOW.

[Robert357]

The 20 best Justice Dept attorneys are going to be all over this advising her Thighness on how to answer the questions in a way that doesn't actually answer the questions. Then their work will be reviewed by some top notch Democratic Party consultants that aren't provided by the Obama Administration.

In the end, she will submit something after the election that says, she doesn't remember anything due to a significant brain injury, and include a doctor's note. Until the election there will be requests for delays and excuses for her not replying due to all kinds of things.

She is a Clinton, she is above all laws.

While I want her held accountable, we have all seen how the entire federal government is making sure she isn't held accountable for anything. Then their is the media that just wants to cheer-lead!

[knarf]

Disqualify a lesser mentality.

Everyone ELSE recalls .... Newspapers have printed it .... there are youtubes and recordings ....

If you don't re-call ... your brain is short circuited.

period.

UNQUALIFIED

[Trumplican]

This written question/answer format is B.S. She has all the questions. No follow up in person depending what “non-answer” she provides.

Just more rigged judicial process.

[hsmomx3]

Does she give those answers in writing or in person?

[Spunky]

She will answer just like she answered several years ago, only this time it will be on paper.

She may not remember, but I do.

Try to Remember

[Edward.Fish]

She is a Clinton, she is above all laws.

I wouldn't be surprised to think our elites think they are above F = ma and F_g = (Gm₁m₂)/r².

[FamiliarFace]

Precisely.

Otherwise she will plead the fifth.

[rfreedom4u]

I believe she will

1. ignore
2. deflect
3. delay

In that order.

[hsmomx3]

Probably blame it on being ill....so she can’t recall!

[Be Careful]

She will say that each question contains too many questions.

[Neidermeyer]

She won’t answer or will answer in non-responsive ways such as pretending not to understand the clear meaning of the question... The judge will then do NOTHING pending a complaint from Judicial Watch asking for more specificity.... Hillary will be given another 30/45 days to answer which will put this past the election.

[Talisker]

...refusing to answer the questions in a debate is a public confession of criminal behavior.

Mmmmmm...no.

All she has to say is that those questions come from a hostile opponent in a contested, ongoing legal case and so are best answered with advice from counsel, and so the debates are not an appropriate forum. Then she can turn it around and claim that it's the same reason Trump won't release his tax returns while he's being audited, nor will he explain them during the debate - inappropriate forum.

[CivilWarBrewing]

Question for Hillary:

1. What was the U.S. Gov't doing in Benghazi requiring at least the presence of at LEAST 40 personnel (Annex and Consulate)?