[Reverend Wright]

was it the Clinton campaign or some anti Trump PAC ?

[Pox]

What's the realistic difference? The fact that the dems feel it necessary to allocate funds to a state the is historically, for the most part, a “safe” haven for their chosen candidate, is very telling, IMO.

I believe the ones I have seen are from a PAC, endorsed by Clinton, but I believe that makes little to no difference in reality. If their side believes it is necessary to spend a significant amount of their campaign funds in a state that they should have locked up, I see it as a sign if significant weakness in their chosen candidate.