Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Captain Rhino

““Heavily armed non-aviation surface combatant of variable tonnage.””

Except those Japanese ones for which the ‘non-aviation’ does not apply.


50 posted on 09/07/2016 3:33:06 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: TalonDJ

You refer to the destroyers that merely look like aircraft carriers?

Come to think of it, the Soviet era Kiev class were officially designated as “heavy aviation cruisers”

This aviation cruiser designation was adopted by the Soviets to apply to several classes of their aircraft carrying ships (Moskova, Kiev, and Kuztnetov) so they could legally transit through the Bosphorus Strait to access the Black Sea under the 1936 Montreux Convention.

The Montreux Convention’s rules are slanted to favor nations that border the Black Sea. So while the Russians to sail very large “aircraft cruisers” through the Straits into the Black Sea, non-bordering states like, for example, the United States, cannot:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montreux_Convention_Regarding_the_Regime_of_the_Straits#Terms_and_consequences_of_the_Convention

However, there are maritime navigation issues that probably preclude taking such large warships through the Strait’s confined and dangerous waters:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosphorus#Maritime


51 posted on 09/07/2016 7:44:33 PM PDT by Captain Rhino (Determined effort today forges tomorrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson