Yes, God forbid the truth gets out!
Posted on 09/08/2016 8:46:23 AM PDT by Red Steel
Oh gawd I hope this fringe story doesn’t make it into the MSM too!
Its Hillary. It’s a natural for her to cheat and lie that makes it credible.
She got some type of bug in her ear.
I just saw that on Drudge as well. I’m hoping someone comes forwarded with audio that was intercepted so that her candidacy will finally be sunk.
Yes, God forbid the truth gets out!
http://articles.latimes.com/1997/oct/04/news/mn-39089
Bill at least has an excuse.
And Hillary can also claim that she “has always had a hearing aid, and it is despicable that the media will pick on me just because I have a disability”.
It won’t make it to the MSM and it wouldn’t help Trump if it did. The perfect explaination for this, even if it is in actuality an earpiece designed to receive auditory signals from another party, is that it was only a hearing aid. The woman is 70+ years old a hearing aid is not out of the question of any kind of normalcy.
There is no way to prove it’s not a hearing aid, if it’s anything at all. This “story” is worthy of its source, Infowars and a midnight Tweet from someone up wayyy too late last night. And yeah, I like James Woods.
But this is worthless.
There’s plenty to hammer Secty. Cankles with. No need to go down the yellow brick road of conspiracy.
Just asking. . . .
Perhaps the job should be downgraded in the Job Description so that potential appointees will know that little or no independent judgment is required in carrying out the duties of Secretary of State!
There haven’t been any previous sightings or discussion of a hearing aid or hearing issue so if there is she should let it be made public.
Likely a receiver, not a transceiver.
-nobody-saw-me-do-it(p)-you-can(a)t-prove-anything.jpg)
Just in case, someone should set up a jam and/or listen for a signal at the debates.
Many hearing aids can receive a wireless audio feed these days. I am looking to upgrade mine now. Somebody needs to directly ask the question. Having hearing aids would be no big deal. Using them to cheat would be.
Will that ear piece be there at 3 AM, or will she have to poll test her response to the terrorist threat like she did in Benghazi, prior to letting our brave boys die!
This is more evidence of the hollow fraud that happens to be 50 feet tall, and needs help standing.
This is not a person of action, who cannot think on her feet, who can barely stand on her feet.
She is a figurehead for the money behind the curtain.
Tht will end all the speculation.
One thing I’m a little disappointed about is that while everyone seems obsessed about this earpiece nonsense, no one seems to be talking about the obvious collusion that was on display between Lauer and Clinton vie a vis attacking Trump via her MSM surrogates.
At one point during the questions, one service woman asked Trump how serious he was about ending the “culture of rape in the military” (paraphrased). He replied with as much consideration that that deserved (which wasn’t much) but before moving on Lauer was all too conveniently quick with a Tweet from Trump back in 2013 where he Tweeted, after a report of rape in the military at the time, that “...sad to say but this is also a result of having men and women serve together...” Blindsiding Trump with an out of context 3 year old Tweet!! Implying that Trump is insensitive to rape and that he doesn’t believe men and women should serve together. So Lauer asked him exactly that, and thus a new meme is born: Trump doesn’t believe women should serve in the military.
How did Lauer KNOW that question was going to be raised (about rape in the military)?
How did he get that tweet so fast???
OBVIOUS collusion and an attempt to smear Trump to help Cankles! Disgusting!!
But no one is talking about that because we’re all obsessed about a hearing aid.
Squeal into it at the broadcast frequencies .... Right in the middle of the debate. LOUDLY!
Repeat randomly every two or four minutes for 2-10 seconds each time.
Of course, then the media will complain that Trump is interfering with the Secret Service. “Endangering” their precious “Her Royal Thighness.”
“It won’t make it to the MSM and it wouldn’t help Trump if it did. The perfect explaination for this, even if it is in actuality an earpiece designed to receive auditory signals from another party, is that it was only a hearing aid. The woman is 70+ years old a hearing aid is not out of the question of any kind of normalcy.”
That said, however, I think that it would be absolutely hilarious if Trump walked onto stage with a hidden jammer, so that if it IS a microphone, it becomes useless. Then she’d be sputtering even more.
Best way to do this is to have Trump wear some kind of receiving gear (I’m not a tech guy, so I don’t know the specifics) during the 1st debate, to find out EXACTLY the frequency/frequencies that this thing uses. Then, for the 2nd and 3rd debates, use a jammer that’s tailor-made to interrupt the communications.
I’d like to see her other ear....
“If it’s a hearing aid, I’m sure she’ll have no problem showing it off to Donald Trump at the Debates.
Tht will end all the speculation.”
She can show it off anytime. If the device is capable of receiving audio transmissions then she could well be cheating. Why not just be forthright with it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.