That is not what he said. He said it was a reversed image video someone made so they could sell the new video as a different view. He called it a hoax. Why are you saying this? Check the transcript.
That is not what he said. He said it was a reversed image video someone made so they could sell the new video as a different view. He called it a hoax. Why are you saying this? Check the transcript.
/////////////
That is exactly right and what he said; I was listening live. He was not fooled, he was calling them out on THEIR LIE on THEM saying it was another angle. He knew what he was talking about.
“That is not what he said. He said it was a reversed image video someone made so they could sell the new video as a different view. He called it a hoax. Why are you saying this? Check the transcript.”
Exactly.
I listened to the full program today.
More and more I see freepers continue to post threads containing Leftist articles which are obvious planted stories about Conservatives.
I think Rush simply doesn’t realize that technology exists to flip the video. He says it can’t be flipped.
Here’s the transcript....
Now, there’s another video that purports to show a different angle. But it doesn’t. This second video has me really confused. In this video, the van approaches from the right. The purpose of the video is to show you a different angle, an angle that shows Mrs. Clinton more clearly. And in this video, the camera is much closer to the van, the van approaches as you’re watching from the right. In the first video, the van approaches from the left. So what they want you to believe is that they’ve simply flipped this to show you a new angle. But you can’t flip the video. I mean, you can play a video backwards, forwards, but it doesn’t change the angle you’re looking at. The footage is identical.
The second video purports to show a new angle. And this new angle shows Hillary in even greater distress, or I should say gives you a better view of the distress, than the first video. But what is intriguing to me is that nobody seems to have noticed that it can’t be the same video. How can, in one video, the van approach from the left and the door on the right side of the van open and Mrs. Clinton gets in. In the next video, same setting, but the van approaches from the right with the street being on the left of it. And then the door opens in the van, which would be the left side of the van and then Mrs. Clinton gets in.
And all of the people in the video appear to be properly placed, and they appear to be reversed, lapel pins are on the opposite lapel in the second video. It’s a really great trick, but the second video can’t be — one of the two can’t be real. One of the two has to be — unless somebody can explain this to me.
At least someone (you) was able to understand grown up conversation.
Sheesh