Every newly discovered missing link in the fossil record or tree of life creates at least two more missing links.
And this is considered science.
Moving further away from the truth.
“Every newly discovered missing link in the fossil record or tree of life creates at least two more missing links.”
Every move halfway to a certain point creates another halfway point. Because you don’t do science or math, you will never get to that initial certain point.
Because I do, particularly calculus, I will reach that point.
This guy says that neo-Darwinists rely on random genetic drift, but he ignores natural selection and changing environment. He doesn’t understand science either.
Which demonstrates that those yelling loudest about "missing links" are not really asking for more evidence, but rather are denying the possibility that any evidence could ever satisfy them.
But in some cases we are 100% certain of evolution even without any "missing links".
A good example is evolution of wolves to dogs which we know was caused by human animal husbandry creating a new sub-species starting over 25,000 years ago.
So the theory part of evolution theory simply says that if we could see those "missing links" they would show us that both natural and man-made evolution happens generation by generation in response to the forces of natural or human selection.