This sounds like gibberish - perhaps referring to the "magnetic echos", my term, left by writes to a particular piece of memory. Supposedly one can see the history of what was stored in the memory as each write physically leaves an imprint, even when over written by subsequent writes.
I thought that was the point of Bleach bit was to bundle a set of disk clearing behavior to make reconstructing the data impervious to the aforementioned forensic recovery technique.
Maybe they had some offsite backups in the cloud?
With what HRC was doing its tough to keep track of it all.
I read somewhere that one of the firms handling the server was backing them up to the cloud. Pretty ridiculous.
“When Clinton associates thought they were deleting her files, they may not have realized that files leave images even in the Deep Web when moved by hackers,” PJ Media noted.”
“This sounds like gibberish”
total gibberish. However, in plain language, it’s likely that copies of her emails still exist somewhere on one or more hacker’s hard drive. these copies could have been hacked along the way from a number of places, including directly from one of Hillary’s many servers or from one of the backup copies from some company like Platt River Networking before they deleted their backups.
There are at least two parties to any e-mail message, the one who sent it and the one who received it. Its an odds on bet that both ends of these messages were not totally erased. If we get a legitimate justice department a whole administration is going down.
I think the writer is referring to the existence of multiple copies. when you compose and e-mail, there is only one. When you send it, there is probably a dozen copies, at least temporarily, and certainly two copies, one on your machine and one on the receiver’s. You can erase yours - melt the hard drive in a smelting furnace - but the other images are still “out there.”