Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/20/2016 12:38:38 AM PDT by Brad from Tennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Brad from Tennessee

This is what the French have been doing for decades.


2 posted on 09/20/2016 12:41:21 AM PDT by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

What do they mean “Our Energy Problems” ??


3 posted on 09/20/2016 1:02:05 AM PDT by Freedom56v2 (This election is about National Sovereignty, Liberty, and Freedom for future generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

National Geographic. Clueless. I couldn’t stand them fifty years ago. I still can’t. Should I apologize?


5 posted on 09/20/2016 2:03:07 AM PDT by wita (Always and forever, under oath in defense of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Thorium: Cleaner Nuclear Power?

http://www.power-technology.com/features/feature1141/


6 posted on 09/20/2016 2:38:10 AM PDT by preacher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee
thanks to ongoing safety concerns, high capital costs, and the availability of lower-cost energy sources

Left out endless litigation and unpredictable regulatory actions, aka political risk.

7 posted on 09/20/2016 3:45:04 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Our energy problems can be solved by kicking environmentalists out of the country.


8 posted on 09/20/2016 4:36:36 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

The future is liquid fluoride thorium reactors.

Safe and tested in the 60’s, very little radiation. What is not to like except energy independence.


11 posted on 09/20/2016 5:02:44 AM PDT by zek157 (Frederic Bastiat was a prophet for these lawless times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Recycling 95% of that fuel is better than what we do now, mostly store it in sheds behind the reactor because we can’t send it to Yucca mountain.


13 posted on 09/20/2016 5:19:18 AM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

The best part about all this is that you get to make armor penetrating depleted uranium ammunition with the by products.


15 posted on 09/20/2016 7:21:02 AM PDT by Delta 21 (Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

What if a different energy technology pops up, which makes reprocessing all the waste for fuel in a new reactor redundant, insofar as providing needed power? One proposal was to encapsulate nuclear waste in a form of glass for long term storage.

The proposed MSR would eventually consume 95%-97% of the fuel waste stored; and, would reduce the storage required for the remainder to about 300 years. The potential fuel currently available would possibly support the burn-up cycle in molten salt reactors for 3-4 decades.


19 posted on 09/20/2016 6:50:35 PM PDT by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson