Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cheryl Mills has been given immunity on the email scandal according to Fox News.
No Link Yet | 23 Sept 2016

Posted on 09/23/2016 8:36:20 AM PDT by 11th_VA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last
To: 11th_VA

This is not good for us. Cheryl Mills is not going to say anything. She will never have to say anything. She is just getting rid of the risk of being charged. Because she is Hillary’s lawyer or the Foundation’s lawyer she can always be silent because of attorney/client privilege. I am very upset with the people getting off in hopes they will testify.


41 posted on 09/23/2016 8:50:45 AM PDT by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Politico says partial immunity.


42 posted on 09/23/2016 8:50:59 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chaguito

You know it.

We all know of crony capitalism - maybe this can be called political cronyism, to reflect the corrupt taking care of the corrupt.


43 posted on 09/23/2016 8:52:00 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Hillary’s next...


44 posted on 09/23/2016 8:53:05 AM PDT by Feckless (The US Gubbmint / This Tagline CENSORED by FR \ IrOnic, ain't it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Cheryl Mills is a 25 year protector of the Clintons. There is no way she is ever going to testify against them. NEVER EVER GOING TO HAPPEN.


45 posted on 09/23/2016 8:53:35 AM PDT by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

She will immunity in return for her telling “everything she knows.”

And, obviously, she knows nothing.


46 posted on 09/23/2016 8:54:11 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

But when she testifies “she knows nothing”.


47 posted on 09/23/2016 8:54:19 AM PDT by jokemoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

As Hillary’s lawyer what happened to place Mills in jeopardy?


48 posted on 09/23/2016 8:54:52 AM PDT by meatloaf (I am one irritated Vet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Did she ‘proffer’ an agreement on what she would testify?

You NEVER grant immunity before you know what they will say. Otherwise they just go up and say “I did it all- it was all my fault, and you can’t touch me”


49 posted on 09/23/2016 8:54:57 AM PDT by Mr. K (<a href="https://imgflip.com/i/1adpjl"><img src="https://i.imgflip.com/1adpjl.jpg" title="made at im)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

I’ve come to believe this means absolutely nothing

Watching the IRS, Benghazi, and now Clinton e-mail scandals, its just political theater. These things are a joke and are proving Congress is completely impotent.

Obama’s minions just ignore subpoenas, hide or delete information at will, no investigation is ever completed - and no one is punished.

It creates a lot of sound and fury, signifying nothing.


50 posted on 09/23/2016 8:55:45 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dasboot

No. Nothing like that I think. What I think this is may probably be inoculation against prosecution under an administration not of the CABAL. She can’t be targeted for certain ‘covered/protected’ immunity charges in future, unfortunately

IOW, I think they now think (or know) TRUMP is going to win and there will be immunities and pardons (if it has to come to that) galore.

That’s what I’m thinking. Just a dumbass country boy’s opinion.


51 posted on 09/23/2016 8:56:48 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
She’s one of the lead figures in the Clinton Crime Family... why on Earth would she get immunity?

The way the FBI has been behaving lately, I would say this move was just to run interference in any effort to prosecute.

I now perceive the FBI as a tool of the Obama administration rather than an objective law enforcement organization. They only enforce laws against Obama's enemies, not his allies.

52 posted on 09/23/2016 8:57:24 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

LOL


53 posted on 09/23/2016 8:57:33 AM PDT by deweyfrank (Nobody's Perfect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA
This is not new... this report is simply saying that she was given immunity back when the FBI was supposedly doing the email investigation.

The investigation is over... done... and Comey decided not to refer it to the DOJ, so it's finished.

News of her having been given immunity is just another poke in the eye over that whole thing. More proof that the so-called investigation was a sham all along.

54 posted on 09/23/2016 8:58:05 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
I suspect the DOJ is corrupt and Lynch is trying to prevent their eventual prosecution without Obama having to stain his legacy by issuing pardons for them himself. The leaders are corrupt and many underlings.
55 posted on 09/23/2016 9:01:37 AM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Which means she’s guilty as sin.


56 posted on 09/23/2016 9:01:41 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (This posting is a microaggression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

I KNOW I’m dreaming, but I’m going to say it, anyway:

SING, Little Birdie! SING!


57 posted on 09/23/2016 9:02:22 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Real prosecutors doing their job grant immunity to obtain testimony/evidence, and know before the immunity is granted what the testimony/evidence will be.

The immunity being granted by the Obama/Lynch/Comey cabal is intended to throw a blanket of immunity over key players/witnesses to protect them from the questioning of Congress and any others who might actually be seeking the truth. They do not want incriminating evidence to surface anywhere in this case.


58 posted on 09/23/2016 9:02:37 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

In exchange for what valuable service to the government did Mills receive immunity?

1) Testifying against wrongdoers.

OR

2) Covering up for Hillary and the Dems.


59 posted on 09/23/2016 9:02:58 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (This posting is a microaggression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

I wonder if this means she can’t take the 5th anyway.

What if she accepted the immunity and will still cover for her Hillary anyway, by lying or claiming memory loss?


60 posted on 09/23/2016 9:03:12 AM PDT by Right-wing Librarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson