Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Morocco turns on what will become the world’s largest solar power plant
Verge ^ | Feb 5, 2016 | Loren Grush

Posted on 09/23/2016 10:57:43 PM PDT by aquila48

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: ChicagahAl

“So, off the top of my head; in order to generate enough power to be equivalent to a nuke plant, you would need an area that is almost 20 miles by 20 miles of solar panels.”

Not quite... You’re off by a factor of ten. It’s 40 sq miles not 400. So an area roughly 6x7 miles. Still a big area for the equivalent of one nuke.

“Re: the thermal solar comment; feel free to do a search for the Ivanpah Solar Plant in California, just South of Primm (Stateline) NV.”

I’ve been by there several times on my way to Vegas. Stopped once and walked near the mirrors to take a close look. I was hoping they had a visitor center and a tour of the plants...

I’m a nuclear engineer, but I’m for all the above when it comes to energy production. Anything that works and is safe enough is fine with me. Let the market decide. In California the price of conventional electricity has gotten high enough and the price of solar low enough that now solar is cheaper. So I’m contemplating going solar, that’ll more or less fix the cost for the next twenty years, whereas PG&E just keeps climbing - 15% the last two years alone.


21 posted on 09/24/2016 12:47:35 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

I wonder what the $$/kWh cost of this monstrosity is.


22 posted on 09/24/2016 12:49:52 AM PDT by wjcsux ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

But how much of that increase each year from PG&E is from operating costs which include the ridiculous things yours and their taxes are paying for brought on by the Kalifornja legislature? Are you considering that every panel will need to be replaced in 10 years or less and that the actual generation will diminish progressively until they die altogether?

Just how in the H are they going to regulate cattle farts outside of just killing them off? Nevermind all of the deer, elk, bear and even domesticated animal farts, or how to know the difference.


23 posted on 09/24/2016 1:48:50 AM PDT by mazda77 (The solution: Vote Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

Morocco gets about 3,000 hours of sunlight per year


What do they do the other 5760 hrs or at night?


24 posted on 09/24/2016 3:57:18 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VTenigma
"What do they do the other 5760 hrs or at night? "

Sleep?

25 posted on 09/24/2016 5:35:09 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Gold and Silver are real money. Everything else is a derivative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mazda77; aquila48
"Just how in the H are they going to regulate cattle farts..."

You have been mis-informed. The rightwing media has focused on the one line in the legislation that says the regulators can regulate cattle farts if the technology is available. But the technology doesn't exist.

The legislation is about cow manure and landfill gas.

It provides funding to lower the cost of a manure digester. Once you know that, you can get up to speed on manure digesters.

Cow manure also causes run-off water pollution which creates algae blooms and dead zones in rivers, lakes and the ocean. Like wise with hog/chicken/veal manure and fertilizers.

The legislation also requires composting of organic material rather than disposing in landfills where they emit methane.

Some disagree. Rather than pay these huge subsidies to produce cellulosic alcohol to be blended into gasoline, it would be better to use this material to produce landfill gas to generate electricity because that process already exists without subsidies

26 posted on 09/24/2016 5:38:37 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ChicagahAl
So, off the top of my head; in order to generate enough power to be equivalent to a nuke plant, you would need an area that is almost 20 miles by 20 miles of solar panels.

I think you've over-guesstimated the required area.

There's 640 acres to the square mile.

So, 6000 acres would be a bit over 9 square miles, or a square just over 3 miles on a side. Still big, but only about one fourtieth of your estimate.

27 posted on 09/24/2016 6:11:53 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: aquila48
Exactly what I was thinking. Very easy for anyone to bomb that over-sized steam generator out of existence.

So after billions and billions of dollars, the best solar science can create is a “steam” generator? Pathetic!

28 posted on 09/24/2016 7:20:27 AM PDT by Awgie (Truth is always stranger than fiction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson