Posted on 09/24/2016 7:14:07 PM PDT by kevcol
Dr Travis Rieder, a moral philosophy professor and bioethicist at Johns Hopkins University, claims reducing the number of babies born each year could save the world.
.
.
If you're Catholic, and you're really going to stare climate change in the face, refuse contraception, and continue to have sex anyway, there's the foreseeable outcome that you will have more children than average.
Well, then you really better be doing your darnedest in all sorts of other ways. When you make that choice, there's a cost. You have to pay for it in some way.
(Excerpt) Read more at express.co.uk ...
Global Warming on Free Republic here, here and here
Well, maybe but what if they go diaperless?
Babys Latest: Going Diaperless
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/19/nyregion/babys-latest-going-diaperless-at-home-or-even-in-the-park.html
Diaper Free Baby.
http://diaperfreebaby.org/
Wouldn’t that help?
Incorrect.
I do not see a steaming plate of hot wings on my desk.
With celery and blue cheese dressing.
I CALL THAT A FOOD SHORTAGE, DAMMIT!
This has merit....
I knew it!
No life on the moon - no ‘warming’ - - place is totally dead. Is that the goal for liberal elites?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.