[Secret Agent Man]

This is overreach by fedgov.

States should ignore it. They get to decide their voter laws and this is not unreasonable by any means. 6 years of no voting action is not unreasonable.

There is no constitutional requirements to keep people on voter roles forever. Nowhere specified. Because sftes determine their voting rules and laws.

[CitizenUSA]

And there’s no disparate impact that can be argued here, either (not that that is constitutional either, but it’s often used as grounds to overturn state laws).

[Rapscallion]

This is overreach by fedgov.

And who is the chief executive in the United States? What is his party? Does the decision benefit his party?

You bet!