Replies

Looks like the "hole" panel will hear the arguments. Good or bad? In any case, maybe, just maybe, they'll shut down the epa's plans to raise energy costs for all. Of course that might derail hildabama's plans to retrain all those laid off coal miners to be computer scientists.

Later

This time tomorrow we’ll have a REAL handle on how to think about investing and in what !

THE GREAT GLOBAL WARING SWINDLE
Want to know the TRUTH about the SCAM called GLOBAL WARMING? This video will bring you up to speed!
Please share it. ALL our freedoms are on the line if these swindlers prevail!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-m09lKtYT4

Bottom line:

DC Circuit will sustain EPA action, case will go to SCOTUS, & outcome will depend on the election. Indeed, if Trump wins EPA may reverse its own action or Trump DOJ will refuse to defend EPA and withdraw opposition to the plaintiffs.

Among Obama’s goals in this matter, don’t overlook the bonanza for all the lawyers involved in the case.

THE GREAT GLOBAL WARING SWINDLE
Want to know the TRUTH about the SCAM called GLOBAL WARMING? This video will bring you up to speed!
Please share it. ALL our freedoms are on the line if these swindlers prevail!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-m09lKtYT4

Thank you for referencing that article rktman. Please note that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.

"The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit will hear oral arguments Tuesday in West Virginia v. EPA, ..."

FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

From related threads …

If parents were making sure that their children were being taught the federal government’s constitutionally limited powers, then grade school children would probably be able to point out the following concerning the constitutionally undefined EPA.

The states have never delegated to the corrupt feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate, tax and spend for environmental issues.

In fact, a previous generation of state sovereignty-respecting justices had clarified in general that powers not expressly constitutionally delegated to the feds, the power to regulate environmental issues in this example, are prohibited to the feds.

”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.

Also consider that the Founding States had made the first numbered clauses in the Constitution, Sections 1-3 of Article I, evidently a good place to hide these clauses from Congress (sarc), to clarify that all federal legislative / regulatory powers are vested in the elected members of Congress, not in the executive or judicial branches, or in faceless, non-elected bureaucrats such as those running the EPA, IRS, FAA, EEOC, DOL and CRC as examples.

So Congress has a constitutional “monopoly” on federal legislative powers whether it want it or not. But by unconstitutionally front-ending itself with non-elected bureaucrats who are effectively running the country, Congress is wrongly protecting federal legislative powers from the wrath of the voters in blatant defiance of Sections 1-3 mentioned above.

In other words, corrupt lawmakers are wrongly letting constitutionally unauthorized federal officials get away with stealing and exercising legislative powers, a lot of these powers actually 10A-protected state powers which the feds have stolen from the states, so that federal bureaucrats can do Congress’s unconstitutional and unpopular legislative work for it.

By allowing this to happen, lawmakers are able to keep their voting records clean so that they can fool low-information patriots, patriots who don’t understand the fed’s constitutionally limited powers, into reelecting them imo.

Remember in November !

Patriots need to support Trump / Pence by also electing a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will work within its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers to not only support Trump’s vision for making America great again for everybody, but will also put a stop to unconstitutonal federal taxes and unconstitutional interference in state affairs.

Note that such a Congress will also probably be willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices.