She looks like she has slathered on 10 pounds of wall spackle to fill in the ruts and wrinkles.
HILLARY AT THE DEBATE THE REAL HILLARY
Posted on 09/27/2016 9:00:20 PM PDT by Voluntaryist
Hillary Clinton and Lester Holt rig the debate against Donald Trump
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Interesting tells....or very dry skin problems?
This was the booster stage of the Trump rocket. Everyone said that Trump won the debate and he has barely got off the pad. Wait until stage two. The next debate will have have the mission to the White House well under way. I expect Mr. Assange to have secretly given an advance copy of his latest WikiLeaks to the Trump Team—well in advance of the next debate. The latest incriminating information will be thrown out across the debate stage like raw meat. It will be bloody. The second stage will be lit in a sequence that will have der Hildebeast so stunned her head will flap back and forth like a bobble head on a roller coaster. YOU ARE FIRED, HILLARY!!!
The Third Stage, debate or no debate, will be Mission Accomplished—Trump to the White House!
Damn right this is collusion. Get this out to Drudge and Rush pronto. With the reputation that Illary has it is bound to resonate among voters BIG LEAGUE
I didn’t watch the Debate.
If I had, I would be out buying a new TV today.
Trump talks about the massive National Debt and how the Government squanders Taxpayer Money and Hillary responds that we wouldn’t have it if Trump paid Federal Income Taxes?
How does she even get applause for such an idiotic statement.
My Hat is off to the FReepers who sat through that and reported it on the Debate Thread last night.
BTW - Hilary does not remind Men of their Ex Wives, she reminds them of their Ex Mother In Laws, the ones who colluded with their Ex Wives to destroy their Marriages.
That's because I think people are starting to see the bias within the press. The lies they put forth to protect her from negative comments. The coverups regarding her health issues. The acceptance of Federal Agencies, Justice Department & FBI, allowing her to escape prosecution, while anyone else would have faced prosecution, along with persecution by the press. All of these things are opening the eyes of more and more people, and I believe they do not like the realities they are witnessing.
Coupled with the obvious corruption within the government, people are silently supporting anybody but Hillary, which even includes Donald Trump now. Their fears of our government now outweigh their fears of a Trump Presidency.
Agreed. This is very good. Evokes the movie Rounders.
Like demented Dan Rather, all she would admit to might be, “OK, fake. But accurate!”
The rules don’t apply to Democrats, from Sandy Berger to Lois Lerner.
“I believe some people may be over thinking this.”
Really? This is a woman that had her husband meet with Lynch to avoid prosecution on her e-mail scandal. And rigged the Democratic primaries against Bernie Sanders per e-mails that cost DWS her position as party chair. She berated NBC execs after Matt Lauer dared to question her about her e-mails by cussing them out and stating that losing to Trump would have her and her cohorts “swinging by a noose.”
No amount of cheating is beyond this crooked bitch.
Well I certainly agree with that. :-) But as I said in my post it is not even necessary in this case. The MSM is too predictable. Some people are overthinking this.
You can feel that way but just wait until tomorrow. This will become a huge story. Guaranteed.
“There are two more debates . . . “
And look at who is moderating the next one: Anderson Cooper and a person from ABC named Martha Raddatz (I think). Looks like more of the same, only DOUBLED.
So expect THREE moderators in the final debate..
Trump against FOUR
From the "Art of the Deal" paper back edition page 185 published in 1987:
"I have great respect for the Japanese, but they are very difficult to deal with. For starters, they come to see you in groups of six or eight or even twelve, so you have to convince them all to make a deal. You may succeed with one or two or three, but 12 is more difficult."
Comes Trump with (2016 - 1987) = 29 years experience since...and how many great deals he has negotiated since 1987?.
So I say to all of little faith...he will demolish Hillary and her "moderators" in short order.
You left out the big one, designed in attempt to bailout and white-wash the dem collusion against Sanders:
“Cyber-Security”
She looks like she has slathered on 10 pounds of wall spackle to fill in the ruts and wrinkles.
HILLARY AT THE DEBATE THE REAL HILLARY
That was days where she “vanished” from the public, deep in what she said was “Presidential Debate Preparation”
Took days and days of “Preparation” for telling everyone to just go to her website for her plans.
*** TRUMP should address the American people and say this in his opening statement at the next debate:
“To all of you Americans watching tonight. As you watch this debate, take note of the following:
I am NOT here to debate BOTH the moderator AND my opponent — as was the case last time when the moderator stepped in with false corrections to what I said and argued several points with me. That’s called being tag-teamed.
That is inappropriate behavior for a moderator in a presidential debate. Candy Crowley did that to Mitt Romney in the 2012 debate with Barack Obama and he was too weak to fight her on it. Unlike Mitt Romney, I will call the moderator out on inappropriate behavior immediately. To those of you in the audience, if you notice the moderator is debating AGAINST me, please verbalize this phrase: “MODERATOR FOUL!” — because if the moderator is not following the rules, why should the audience follow the rules of not clapping or booing?
Those of you watching tonight, I’d like you to:
1. Notice how many softball questions they give my opponent compared to how many personal attack questions they direct to me. That’s because the mainstream media is in pockets of the Democratic Party, in case you hadn’t noticed. This is called “media bias.”
2. Notice how when I make a good point, the moderator tries to shift attention away from the point that was made or interrupts me — but doesn’t do the same for my opponent.
3. Notice how calculated Hillary is when she has that fake smile plastered on her face while citing far-fetched allegations about me. I’m a real person. My opponent is a phony and a fraud. Just look at all the scandals that have swirled around Hillary and her husband for the past 30 years. It’ll make your head spin. That someone with an astonishing history of dishonesty tries to pin fraudulent behavior or racism on someone like me is unacceptable and embarrassing to her.
4. When politicians don’t have a valid argument against their opponent on principles, they resort to ad-hominem attacks. I may attack her record (deleting 33,000 emails and being against protecting our borders), but I do not do ad-hom attacks, although there are so many I could do. For example, when she cited likely false allegations from a mere handful of my past employees many years ago, I could equally have cited all the nasty things her personal secret service agents have said about working for her. Or many other “hear-say stories” in her past. But that’s petty.
Those of you watching are smart enough to see the phony person that is here on the stage with me.
Let’s stick to the issues tonight.
Thank you, Donald Trump.
Love your post. Trump needs to do exactly that.
Please send this to the Trump Team (and include the link to this video)... They do read their emails! Excellent job, AGS.
I don’t care. Next debate, I would come out and say:
Trump: “Give her a teleprompter, and a lazy boy chair, all the questions before hand, and an ear piece, fifteen minute breaks. Don’t matter. People will see through your answers.”
That is very good suggestion. In the meantime, the RNC or some other group needs to address the very real possibility of collusion and corruption of the debate process to prevent further abuse by participants.
The evidence of wrongful conduct from Clinton is overwhelming. Bias by Holt was mentioned at the very outset of three debate by a large number of observers and Illary had immediate answers that implied she knew the questions beforehand. If she had preplanned arrangements with Holt to respond to her by interrupting Trump it stands to reason she was privy to debate questions. The concern on the faces of Bill and Chelsea during the 90 minutes was telling. NBC was repeatedly mentioned in hacked e-mails from DNC brass when coordinating news topics during the Clinton campaign, and the reports of fury by Illary after the Lauer debate certainly got their attention.
And let’s not forget her smug attitude during and after the debate, as HRC joked that Trump’s complaint about the mic probably meant he did not have a good night. She needs to have that smirk wiped off her mug after this latest stunt, and the threat to cancel the remaining debates should definitely be considered
The RNC knew and accepted what would happen, and knows what will happen in the future. The Trump campaign likewise hasn’t objected. People can’t be saved from themselves.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.