No Nate sucks(Quantitatively true), he missed Brexit and he was kind of arrogant about it before that he had it right and it would fail. He's a smug, idiot fake savant, I've seen him interviewed. He admits he whiffed on Trump and he continues to whiff. He's like a psychic medium who guessed one thing right but now can't predict what direction the sun will set. In addition to make this a hatefest on Nate more believable, he was outed as getting internal polls from the Obama camp in 2012. Not unethical but not honest as he woofed about he was using just public polls to get his predictions.
Let’s have a moment for rational thought.
1) She didn’t have the answers in advance. Secrets with that many involved don’t remain secret. Someone would talk. No one has because it didn’t happen.
2) She didn’t have a secret radio to feed her answers. It didn’t happen. She had a microphone, like Trump.
3) The winner of the debate is the candidate who collects votes from it. As of now, polls suggest that’s Trump. It’s not who makes telling points, or rebuts best in academic debate style. It’s who collects votes. It’s not really a “debate”, and never has been.
4) Trump didn’t hit her on this or didn’t hit her on that and why didn’t he talk about this or that . . . he’s not there to make his supporters feel good. He’s there to collect new votes. There is no value in risking a bully appearance by being an attack dog When He’s Ahead. When you’re ahead . . . it’s not like football. You CAN play prevent defense. The clock will run out. He will win if he doesn’t make mistakes.
5) He’s not a politician. He’s not a debater. He’s winning BECAUSE he’s not a politician and not a debater. 67% of the US population does not have a bachelors degree. That is the richer territory to mine for votes than the degreed.