I doubt there is ever a disadvantage to having the media on your side.
The media siding with Hillary may cost the media credibility and viewers. But it’s not likely to cost Hillary voters.
I disagree. There are so many people I talk to who just turn off the news because it’s garbage.
But it’s not likely to cost Hillary voters.
.....................................................
I disagree. The American people are sick and tired of being lied to. Thanks to the internet and interest in foreign countries, this election is under a magnifying glass like never before. What worked four years ago is not working now. We are wiser and we are awake. Trump is going to win in a landslide the likes of which has not been seen since Reagan.
Trump has been saying for a long time that the system is rigges and that the media is dishonest. I hink he did a wonderfuljob of proving in the debate that both are true. Remember all his years on The Apprentice. Trump was not going to let a “moderator” put him on the hot seat. He did a beautiful job of bobbing and dodging and Hillery nor her accomplice ever laid a glove on him. Next go round Hillaey will bite the hook and in the third, Trump will reel her in.
I disagree as well. I have been telling my daughter who lives in California (nuff said), that the media has been very unfair and untruthful about Trump. She had a hard time believing me, until Monday night...she’s switched her vote...contact NBC and let them know there is a reason 2/3 of America no longer buys their spin. I believe they are a dying business...thank goodness!
I disagree in this special case. Since Trump's campaign is built around the idea that corrupt insiders (media and incumbents) control our government to our detriment, evidence that the media is collaborating with the insider candidate is a huge positive for Trump. Trump clearly lost the debate on points, but he just as clearly won on the narrative. The narrative is the reason why his poll number have risen since the debate.