Posted on 09/30/2016 9:50:32 AM PDT by nwrep
Here a poll of Trump winning by a lot in the business community.
- - - - -
“CRN Poll: Trump Continues To Lead Clinton By Double Digits
CRN ^ | September 28, 2016 | Jimmy Sheridan
Posted on 9/28/2016, 2:57:58 PM by 2ndDivisionVet”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3474576/posts
“Bob Gold, a sales account executive at El Segundo, Calif-based PCM, No. 28 on CRN’s Solution Provider 500 list, believes Trump would be better for business because of the candidate’s business background.
“Trump is a more experienced businessman and he understands how business is done better than his opponent,” Gold said.”
I did read it. I believe Trump was our only hope to beta Hillary. He changed the issue dynamic to work in our favor. He just needs to stick with and live or die based on it until the end. Then I believe we will win.
Republicans are greatly outpacing Dems in absentee voter request forms from 2012. So that is a good sign.
Look, there are two more debates. I suspect Trump will do better the next two debates.
These MSM polls are so predictable, it is not even funny.
I think people are tuning that nonsense out
Even with the corrupt media, pollsters and government on her side, she can only still beat Trump by 4?
What’s up with that?
Hell ary getting sick again today. *cough cough hack cough*
https://twitter.com/Always_Trump/status/781909679001706496
“Hillary’s cough is BACK! Here she is attempting to stave off a coughing fit at a recent Fort Pierce FL rally #HillarysCough #HillarysHealth “
Think about it: Trump's rallies are attracting huge crowds everywhere, while Hillary's rallies could probably fit into an elementary school cafeteria. And we've seen several videos where trying to find volunteers to work for the Hillary Clinton campaign is very hard to do. And you're seeing Trump political signs everywhere.
I admit that weightings are difficult. Do you try to capture what a state has done in the past, do you try to capture where the voters say they are now, or do try to use indications (like the Trump rallies) to factor in momentum?
It’s not an exact science by any means. However, some things are probably wrong. You can’t have all females in a poll, when the obvious answer is that there are a lot of men out there. I think there are some thresholds for right/wrong track that should make a person suspicious of a poll. Men/women should be about 48/52, for example. Racial distribution should reflect the state census.
That kind of thing.
How do you factor in Trump’s rallies versus Hillary’s? I’d say that any time a poll tells you that Hillary is squashing Trump, it is absolutely fair to be skeptical.
In our area, I use yard signs. What does it mean that it’s about 1000-1, Trump-Clinton? I’d say that Trump is hotter.
And they only show the podium shots for both candidates on the media reports to make it appear the candidates have the same crowd sizes showing up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.