Posted on 10/09/2016 10:31:17 PM PDT by Chickensoup
What is wrong with Hillary Clinton's outfits? I have noticed that she seems to go for the pants under dress and pants under long skirt look favored by the local modern Moslims (I use the word Moslims deliberately, it is the old spelling).
At first I thought the outfits were designed to hide figure flaws or medical equipment, but the more I look at them the more I wonder whether there may be a religious component or a signaling to her Moslim Saud owners by wearing what no Western woman would ever wear in public.
Your thoughts?
I wonder how much tax dollars are being spent to build mosques.
Agreed, and the debate is now being re-run on C-SPAN
Diapers plus bullet proof stuff.
diapers are pretty non issue, the depends pull ups are worn by many and they don’t dress like Moslims.
She did not need a bullet proof sheath in that venue.
It was a take on the tuxedo. She was trying to look masculine. Unfortunately, next to hulking Donald, she looked quite like a little girl in dress-up.
She was tired at the end. He voice began to go, but overall, she looked healthy. At one point, she even attempted to encroach on his space with her “and your little dog, too” expression. The constant smirk went hollow more than once, especially when he said “You’d be in jail.”
I saw no evidence of incontinence or other aides and no evidence of illness. I think she didn’t feel the fly due to recent Botox. Might have had a bit of Botox in her fingers, too.
She is a fat old woman. That is how rich old fat women dress.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.