Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland

What does that prove? Surely, in all these years, the mother could have requested this or acquired a DNA sample from Bill. Seems the lack of a DNA test is a negative, not a positive, for the kid.


7 posted on 10/12/2016 8:35:20 PM PDT by ChocChipCookie ("Demons run when a good man goes to war.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ChocChipCookie

You can not just demand a paternity test ?
Good luck finding a judge to order it against the Clintons .


16 posted on 10/12/2016 8:43:47 PM PDT by ncalburt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: ChocChipCookie
What does that prove? Surely, in all these years, the mother could have requested this or acquired a DNA sample from Bill. Seems the lack of a DNA test is a negative, not a positive, for the kid.

You seem to have it figured out better than I do. I have no idea what the Tweet means. Can you explain?

And I agree on your point about lack of DNA test being a negative, not a positive situation for the kid. Again, I don't get it.

40 posted on 10/12/2016 9:08:34 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson