She's brutal, condescending ... and nasty!
1 posted on
10/13/2016 3:44:47 AM PDT by
Zakeet
To: Zakeet
Well, they didn’t exactly guard zealously against leaks, did they?!
2 posted on
10/13/2016 3:52:58 AM PDT by
miss marmelstein
(Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Muslims)
To: Zakeet
the Clinton political machine is held together by greed and fear. my guess is that it will tear itself apart as Mrs. Clinton gets sicker and different members of the group try to take over control of the group.
3 posted on
10/13/2016 3:55:48 AM PDT by
PCPOET7
To: Zakeet
The article says nothing ... this is an intentional reversal of 'damning with faint praise' ... it's 'praising with faint damnation' ... intended for the reader to say 'oh, there's nothing in the wikileaks emails but some infighting and caring staff.'
Prop. a. gan. da.
5 posted on
10/13/2016 3:59:14 AM PDT by
tinyowl
(A equals A)
To: Zakeet
Just read this really poorly written and researched BBC article. Absolutely no focus on the truly serious issues raised in the leaked emails and it’s buying into the spin that Podesta didn’t mean Hillary hated ordinary Americans when it is clear that she did and does. I loathe British news outlets. Particularly the BBC.
6 posted on
10/13/2016 3:59:23 AM PDT by
miss marmelstein
(Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Muslims)
To: Zakeet
The revelations in the emails were obtained illegally, but ...but if they reveal cheating, crimes and treason.....WHO CARES?
23 posted on
10/13/2016 4:18:32 PM PDT by
ROCKLOBSTER
(She talks like a gangster.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson