Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WildHighlander57; RoosterRedux; admin

But what even is the basis to that claim? Yes, these are the same writers who wrote the earlier bogus story on Trump and women, and both these women’s claims stink to high heaven, as they say.

But this is not the CA Jessica Leads, and I see no evidence of the Times dropping the story. Here she is in two prominent Times stories from today:

http://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch/?action=click&contentCollection&region=TopBar&WT.nav=searchWidget&module=SearchSubmit&pgtype=Homepage#/jessica+leeds/since1851/allresults/1/allauthors/newest/


24 posted on 10/14/2016 6:18:42 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: 9YearLurker

I think you may be taking the term “dropped the story” in the wrong context. Think of it as “dropped a bombshell” and it makes more sense. I did a double take too, but thought about it a little and it makes sense if you look at it in a different context.

Another thread here on FR implies both women are also Clinton supporters and donors. Is it true? Not sure but I’d believe it, that’s the way the Clintons do things.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3480435/posts


25 posted on 10/14/2016 6:58:30 AM PDT by Paleo Pete (Proud to be a redneck deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson