Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justlittleoleme

They want to get rid of the replacements for the CFCs, which were a non-problem in the first place as proven by the alleged problem vanishing much faster than their models predicted. Reagan got conned with the Montreal Treaty. That made everyone buy new ACs. Now they want you to buy a new AC again and have you run PROPANE as its coolant. So your house will burn down when there’s a leak and a spark. CFCs and HFCs were inert, no fire hazard. They want big places to go back a century and use AMMONIA as their AC coolant so we can have more bad chemical burns from that.


19 posted on 10/15/2016 12:05:37 AM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (Obama been Liberal. Hope Changes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JohnBovenmyer

When the real question is, what chemical benefiting mankind will NOT ultimately end up on the list of BAD chemicals associated with the mythical, pseudo science, of global catastrophic warming?

The cost of compliance with government rules and regulations written by unelected bureaucrats will go down in history as the straw that bankrupted the public, unless state governments grow a pair and tell the bureaucrats we will not comply.


21 posted on 10/15/2016 1:05:59 AM PDT by wita (Always and forever, under oath in defense of Life, Liberty and. the pursuit of Happiness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson