Every Trump accuser had no video except their word and it is taken at face value.
Yes, that's the point I was trying to make.
There's a double-standard. Trump can be accused of anything with no evidence, and it's front-page news.
But, without video or audio proof, nothing sticks to Clinton.
Without the cellphone video, do you think Hillary's health would be an issue?
Even now, the emails on Wikileaks are treated as suspect because "they could have been modified".
Yes, people are rightfully afraid of the Clintons. But, without someone willing to go on the record about her tantrum, there's nothing.
The sad part is that it wouldn't even matter to a large percentage of Hillary voters. They would agree with her tirade against Lauer -- just like you agreed with Trump's rejoinder to Clinton "because you'd be in jail".
Don't shoot the messenger. This is how it is, and neither you or I can change it.