Dilbert, you don’t get it? I live in one of the States whose Legislature stood up to the Feds and said that we were responsible for our own drivers’ licenses. The Obama folks found that unacceptable and immediately started pressuring us in every way possible.
The purpose, of course, like everything out of this corrupt regime, is to make it easier for terrorists and illegal aliens to blend in with society. How? . . . by passing out licenses like Halloween candy and then claiming that they are proof sufficient for voting, flying, getting benefits intended for citizens or anything else that illegal aliens find it difficult to do now. Of course, it is difficult FOR A REASON! But the Feds don’t want that and they certainly don’t want States to have even a sliver of autonomy left.
There are three sets of states:
1) State which has strict criteria for Drivers License and does not issue these to non-citizens - assume that Missouri as cited above is one of these.
2) State which issues Drivers License to both citizens and non-citizens and which includes security logos on the these as specified for Federal uses.
3) State which issues Drivers License to both citizens and non-citizens but does not include security logos -- Pennsylvania and 4 other states. These are not going to be accepted by FEDGOV as of 2018.
So... what set of sets need to be corrected -- the 3rd one (without security logos) or both the 3rd and 2nd one -- which must stop enabling illegal immigration!
Real id was bush ii. 2005.
Was against it then and fought against it then. Pubbers passed it.