Posted on 10/18/2016 8:15:44 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
So why is any bandwidth ever devoted on this forum for unsubstantiated actions by Trump with women he has met over the years?
We’ve heard about these tirades ad nauseum. And yet in all these years with the technology available, no video has ever been produced. Not trying to be a troll, because I think she does act this way. She lets the mask slip a little bit in public from time to time. But none of these epic meltdowns have been preserved. Without a video, it’s not going to go anywhere.
Not all hearsay — we can see what happened to Lauer after the fact.
To your point, however, there’s method in Hillary’s ban on cell phones in her presence, and using a private email server, and “forgetting” everything that might cause her a problem, and only using carefully selected health care providers, and ...
Hillary is the mistress of plausible deniability — to the point of implausibility.
This is a completely useless report absent video of the incident.
a shame the cameraman captured not one second of any of this on..... camera
Oh, like: “So madam secretary, I understand you had a little hissy fit about matty lauer after the first debate and wanted him fired for blindsiding you. Any comment?”. Helldabama: “Just more made up scenarios from the radical right wing extremists. Matt did a wonderful job. Let’s move on.”
Hearsay waste of time. No one thought to hit record in a world where everyone has a smart phone in their pocket.
Agreed ! All hearsay .
With no cellphones allowed near her, the only audio would be that which the TV technicians would have been captured accidently.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NfFAaPZqs8
But actual identified, named individuals have alleged that Trump behaved inappropriately toward them. I don’t see anyone stepping forward to claim this.
Without video, it means very little. Even with audio or video, it means little.
The people that would vote for Hillary are vile people. That sort of language and behavior means nothing to them. The acted in shock of the Trump video but it’s very common place for them.
They just put on a production to act offended to sway voters.
It’s really going to come down to JOBS, IMMIGRATION, TRADE, NATIONAL SECURITY, ETC.
A random guy reading this story out loud does not constitute video proof in any way.
Agreed. On substantiated claims are only good against a Republican. Get a video or shut up about it. There’s enough “hearsay” about the Clintons out there already.”
One more unsubstantiated claims against them is not going to do a darn thing!
Agreed ! All hearsay .
With no cellphones allowed near her, the only audio would be that which the TV technicians would have been captured accidently.
But if it looks like it
Smells like it
..and draws flies !! Draw your own conclusions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NfFAaPZqs8
Maybe James O’Keefe will have this on video, wouldn’t that be great.
Exactly. Without any proof, this is nothing and makes us look as bad as the dems.
Fits with all those Secret Service tales from the 90’s about her throwing lamps and vases around the White House.
If this is true, why were ANY of the questions approved in advance?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.