Posted on 10/20/2016 1:57:18 AM PDT by M. Thatcher
Theres about four minutes per Hillary. I’m going to nit pick since she’s the smartest woman in the world.
There’s (There IS) about four minutes.....
Shouldn’t that be
There’re (There ARE about four minutes.
As for the four minute drill. I knew that from a top secret clearance I had in the Navy in the 1970s. I figure that would be old news by now but apparently now.
Things could be worse alert!
P.S. This is really not funny.
I stand corrected, he actually said: Ill keep you in suspense.
I wonder if the Trump team knows this. Does anyone know how to get it to their campaign staff?
Obviously, this woman can’t keep her mouth shut, and so therefore has no business being anywhere near the Oval Office.
I’m absolutely speechless.
I watched that and thought it odd that she mentioned the exact time lapse.
What a nasty woman.
We should see that graphic on as many Hillary threads as possible...great work!
Close.
‘I’ll keep you in suspense ‘.
She and Obama are in cahoots with Putin. He is allowing them to toss him out as a straw man because this is the only way they can see to protect against WikiLeaks and defeat Trump. He and Obama are rattling sabers to make sure we’re concerned and give the belief that there might be some confrontation.
If the Beast wins, Putin will own her...and us.
thanks. They will now turn this into him wanting to be king and dictator, etc.
He could have said if there’s not rampant fraud, but Trump is Trump and it’s worked so far.
Hillary was willing to jeopardize our national security for political gain.
Ah - but according to the establishment, Trump is the reckless and dangerous one.
People in Washington truly live in an upside down world.
That’s why they’re gung-ho on Hillary.
Loose lips....private server with confidential info..........and she thinks Trump is a problem? Hillary, look in the mirror.....YOU will get us all killed, YOU will be careless with war...you already have been.
Trump did say something like you mentioned. I had no problem with his answer. Why should he say what he will do in that aspect. He was being led down a path and refused to play.
As for HRC...jeez I heard her statement and it dovetailed with a tweet campaign that rolled out the same time. You know that tweet was planned in committee and mulled over for several days. This was all to paint Trump as unstable...
Will anyone report that she gave away secrets? If she would have said minutes she might have been fine. I read the Bloomberg article and even there it was speculation in terms of possible time. Anyone could probably make an educated guess I suppose. But for a presidential candidate to actually nail down the timline with such authority is truly the mark of an unstable person.
I read an excellent article late last year that was a re-printing of a much earlier article regarding Trump a nuclear non-proliferation. The article was regarding an interview he had in the mid 80s. He was trying to help out the Reagan administration with those efforts. Whether he actually was helping the administration or not I don’t know. Maybe he was trying to make himself important, I really do not know. But my take away was that Trump is not a nuclear cowboy. I really think he detests war and what it brings. From that interview in the 80s I do know that he will not be quick on that nuclear trigger if god forbid it ever has to be considered.
Damn HIllary and her dark heart. I really think she was trying to both play Trump and send a message to Putin. Trump I think is trying to stop a war and Hillary is trying to start one. What the hell is going on...
Late night early morning ramblings...
She talked about nukes as if she has already prepared plans to launch them. Spine-chilling.
She’s heavily medicated. I’m re-watching the debate, focusing on Hillary, and she is practically falling asleep in between questions. She keeps picking up her pen and writing something, puts the pen down, then picks it up again to write, over and over. She’s also not reacting to anything Donald says, which is so unlike the first debate. I don’t think she meant to divulge that info, but she’s even more careless than usual because of the drugs. The truth is there’s something seriously wrong with her and she should not be running.
Agreed across the board.
If Clinton does win because more legal votes are cast for her than for him, he will accept her as president. The MSM is just trying to make news where there isn’t any.
Wallace should’ve asked that question of both candidates.
I saw that look in last debate too - she looked like she was about to drift off when she was not talking. She is not well.
In a few places I've seen them say (in that arrogant tone they always have): "Oh, everyone already knew this, this has been common knowledge forever, it's all over the Internet, anyone who thinks this is some kind of revelation is just proving how uninformed they are," yada yada.
Julius and Ethel Rosenberg believe that they would like to see her get what they got . . . it’s only fair!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.